He did....he gave him the chance before the war began.
No problem though.......one less terrorist on the earth.
2007-02-08 01:18:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by primoa1970 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
I doubt George W. Bush has any "christian love" to show. Look at his record. During his stint as governor of Texas he presided over more executions than any public official in modern history including the mentally retarded and born again christian Karla Faye Tucker. In Tucker's case, when asked about it, he openly mocked her. Here is an excerpt from Tucker Carlson's interview with Bush at at that time:
"In the weeks before the execution, Bush says, a number of protesters came to Austin to demand clemency for Karla Faye Tucker. "Did you meet with any of them?" I ask. Bush whips around and stares at me. "No, I didn't meet with any of them," he snaps, as though I've just asked the dumbest, most offensive question ever posed. "I didn't meet with Larry King either when he came down for it. I watched his interview with Tucker, though. He asked her real difficult questions like, 'What would you say to Governor Bush?'" "What was her answer?" I wonder. "'Please,'" Bush whimpers, his lips pursed in mock desperation, "'don't kill me.'" I must look shocked — ridiculing the pleas of a condemned prisoner who has since been executed seems odd and cruel — because he immediately stops smirking. "
Where is the compassion? Where is the "christian love?" Is it any surprise he showed none to Saddam?
2007-02-08 09:36:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Murazor 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why didn't Saddam show Islamic love?
Why don't humanity show human love to him?
Perhaps, love is not at all easy to show.
LOVE is something to be practiced by each individual, nor to be shown.
2007-02-08 09:25:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush is not a christian, he is a member of the Illuminati. They have been caught on tape doing mock sacrifices of children and worshiping a foreign god.
2007-02-08 09:38:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Do you mean we should have burned him at the stake instead?
It's not too late, some of the body parts must still be around, somewhere.
-----------------------------------------
primoa197... -
And that one somehow offsets the millions of new terrorists the Bush policy has created?
You might want to check your arithmetic on that one. I am not sure we came out ahead. In fact, I'm pretty sure we got screwed.
2007-02-08 09:20:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Because maybe for a change he made a decision using logic instead of bronze age fairy tales. Saddam Hussein was scum of the Earth and deserved every ounce of suffering he got. Furthermore Bush wasn't the one who executed him it was Hussein's own countrymen who did it. He was a tyrranical despot with no redeeming values as a human being and we should be glad he's dead.
2007-02-08 09:58:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
God is love and He is just, there are consequences for our actions. Saddam was a very bad boy and had to face the earthly consequences.
2007-02-08 09:47:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Honest Answer: He was too busy with his buddy Ted Haggard.
2007-02-08 09:36:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
"Christian love" does not mean "to let terrorists off the hook". There is justice within that love.
2007-02-08 09:25:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by AdoreHim 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Political realities were more important to him than vague humanitarian ideals.
2007-02-08 09:18:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Because Bush is a dirty terrorist, not a christian.
2007-02-08 09:18:56
·
answer #11
·
answered by citrus punch 4
·
5⤊
2⤋