to be religous and be a bad person... or not be religious and be a kind, good person?
2007-02-07 21:46:41 · 7 answers · asked by Euro 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Well it's wrong to claim to be religious and say for example that you're a 'Christian', but not actually walk the walk.
It's better not to be religious and be a good person. You can always get religion later if you feel led to it.
2007-02-08 05:14:12 · answer #1 · answered by Artist V 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The second, no doubt about it. There are plenty of people out there who fit into both categories and I'd definately rather associate myself with the latter.
2007-02-08 06:00:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is better to be the second one as Jesus said that it is a great offence for someone to be lukewarm,better to be hot or cold than this.
2007-02-08 05:56:44 · answer #3 · answered by Sentinel 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To be the best person you can be.
2007-02-08 05:49:22 · answer #4 · answered by Screamin' Banshee 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2 choice.
2007-02-08 06:38:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
=/ the second one? im not religious.. but im good. =)
2007-02-08 05:49:43 · answer #6 · answered by emmaness123 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
none is good. Both are hell bound
2007-02-08 05:56:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋