English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

7 answers

Must be someone who hated all his hats really bad in his past life

2007-02-07 13:55:10 · answer #1 · answered by FAUUFDDaa 5 · 1 1

Being reincarnated as a person is the second best outcome of a life. Only a person has the capacity to obtain wisdom and achieve the best outcome which is not to be reincarnated at all but to pass on to Nirvhana.
No person is ever reincarnated in the sense that I think you mean. I do not die and wake up as somebody else because there is no permanent "I" that can move on. My consciousness finishes with me but my Karma, the effects of the good and bad actions that I have taken during my life, does pass on. Reaching a state of Nirvanha just means that you have no Karma left behind you to pass on. Good karma does not cancel bad karma. Doing good or bad for the sake of vanity or for some reward is still an attachment which carries karma. Only action without attachment is free from karma so that doing good purely because it is right is the only way to be free from karma.
The Pope as well as all spiritual people who care about the human condition follows all of the teachings of Buddha and should be respected for that. Other religions have additional beliefs than those taught as Buddhist philosophy but this is not in conflict with the desire to obtain wisdom or living what Buddhists consider to be a good life. This is why we Buddhists have no religious conflict with other belief systems. All humans are searching for meaning and most will fail. We know that most of us are tied to going around the circle until we accumulate enough wisdom to truly understand and that none of us is equiped to correctly judge anothers understanding. The Pope can just as readily obtain Nirvhana as anybody else. You do not even need to be a Buddhist in order to attain Nirvhana.

2007-02-07 22:23:46 · answer #2 · answered by John B 4 · 1 0

People aren't born the Pope: people are born people, and therefore, if because of the persons upbringing and personal experience they eventually become the pope, this is a natural course of events. You seem to be trying to find some contradiction in the concept of reincarnation when there is none in this case.

2007-02-07 21:54:19 · answer #3 · answered by Alex M 2 · 2 1

The Pope is not such a bad guy. I'd rather be reincarnated as him than someone like Ted Bundy.

2007-02-07 21:55:31 · answer #4 · answered by KS 7 · 1 1

wow WOW wow!!!! dont you dare start talking **** about the buddhists! study the damn religion before you even think to talk **** buddhism is the ONE religion that i find is actually PEACEFUL dont screw around with them

2007-02-07 21:53:15 · answer #5 · answered by NONAME 3 · 2 1

What do you mean?

2007-02-07 21:53:03 · answer #6 · answered by joe1max 4 · 0 1

Buddhists practice lovingkindness, patience, and forgiveness toward all people. Our golden rule is "Do No Harm !" to anyone.
We are patient and tolerant toward everyone, even if they do not understand our beliefs, even if they Mock us.
Patiently read this information about us, to understand how we choose to love all people
unconditionally, and please have a good week.
Love vs. Attachments.
What in the world is the difference between loving a person and being attached to them ?
Love is the sincere wish for others to be happy, and to be free from suffering.
Having realistically recognized others' kindness as well as their faults, love is always focused on the other persons welfare. We have No ulterior motives to fulfill our self-interest, or to fulfill our desires; to love others simply because they exist.
Attachment, on the other hand, exaggerates others' good qualities and makes us crave to be with them. When we're with them, we're happy, but when we're separated from them, we are often miserable. Attachment is linked with expectations of what others should be or do.
Is love as it is usually understood in our society
really love ? or attachment ?
Let us examine this a bit more. Generally we are attracted to people either because they have qualities we value or because they help us in some way. If we observe our own thought processes mindfully, and carefully - we'll notice that we look for specific qualities in others.
Some of these qualities we find attractive, others are those our parents, or society value.
We examine someone's looks, body, education,
financial situation, social status. This is how most of us decide on whether or not the person holds any true value to us.
In addition, we judge people as worthwhile according to how they relate to us. If they help us, praise us, make us feel secure, listen to what we have to say, care for us when we are sick or depressed, we consider them good people, and it is this type of people we are most likely to be more attracted to.

But this is very biased, for we judge them only in terms of how they relate to "us", as if we are the most important person in the world.
After we've judged certain people to be good for us, whenever we see them it appears to us as if goodness is coming from them, but if we are more aware, we recognize that we have projected this goodness onto them.

Desiring to be with the people a lot who make us feel good, we become emotional yo-yo's -
when we're with these people, we're Up, when we're not with these people, we're Down.

Furthermore, we form fixed concepts of what our relationships with those people will be and thus have expectations of them. When they do not live up to our expectations of them, we're very disappointed, or may become angry !
We want them to change so that they will they will match what we think they are. But our projections and expectations come from our own minds, not from the other people.
Our problems arise not because others aren't
who we thought they we're, but because we mistakenly thought they were something they
aren't.
Checklist: "I Love You if __________ "
What we call love is most often attachment.
It is actually a disturbing attitude that overestimates the qualities of another person.
We then cling to tightly to that person, thinking our happiness depends on that person.
"Love, on the other hand, is an open and very calm, relaxed attitude. We want someone to be happy, and free from suffering simply because they exist. While attachment is uncontrolled and much too sentimental, Love is direct and powerful. Attachment obscures our judgment and we become impatient, angry, and impartial, helping only our dear one's and harming those who we don't like. Love builds up others, and clarifies our minds, and we
access a situation by thinking of the greatest good for everyone. Attachment is based on
selfishness, while Love is founded upon cherishing others, even those who do not look very appealing to the eyes. Love looks beyond
all the superficial appearances, and dwells on the fact that they are just like us: they want inner peace, happiness, and want to avoid suffering. If we see unattractive, dirty, ignorant people, we feel repulsed because our selfish minds want to know attractive, intellectual, clean, and talented people. Love, on the other hand, never evaluates others by these superficial standards and looks much deeper into the person. Love recognizes that regardless of the others' appearances, their experience is the same as ours: they seek inner peace, to be happy, to be free from sufferings, and to do their best to avoid problems.
When we're attached, we're not mentally and emotionally free. We overly depend on and cling to another person to fulfill our mental and especially our emotional needs. We fear losing the person, feeling we'd be incomplete without him.
This does not mean that we should suppress our emotional needs or become aloof, alone and totally independent, for that too does not solve the problem. We must simply realize our unrealistic needs, and slowly seek to eliminate them. Some emotional needs may be so strong that they can't be dissolved immediately.
If we try to suppress them or pretend they do not exist, we become anxious, insecure, falling into a depression. In this case, we can do our best to fulfill our needs while simultaneously working gradually to subdue them.
"The core problem is we seek to be loved, rather than to love. We yearn to be understood by others rather than to understand them. In all honesty, our sense of emotional insecurities comes from the selfishness obscuring our own
minds. 'We can develop self-confidence by recognizing our inner potential to become a selfless human being with many, many magnificent qualities, then we'll develop a true and accurate feeling of self-confidence. And
then we'll seek to increase true love, without attachments, to increase compassion, to cultivate patience and understanding, as well as generosity, concentration and wisdom.'

'Under the influence of attachment we're bound by our emotional reactions to others. When they are nice to us, we're happy. When they ignore us, or speak sharply to us, we take it personally and are unhappy. But pacifying attachment doesn't mean we become hard-hearted. Rather, without attachment there will be space in our hearts and minds for genuine Affection and Impartial Love for them.
We'll be actively involved with them.
If we learn to subdue our attachments, we can most definitely have successful friendships and personal relationships with others !! These relationships will be richer because of the freedom and respect - the relationships will be based on. We'll care about the happiness and the misery of all human beings equally, simply because everyone is the same in wanting and needing inner peace, happiness, and not wanting to suffer. However, our lifestyles and interests may be more compatible with those of some people more so than with others, and that is alright. In any case, our relationships will be based on mutual Love, mutual interests, and the wish to help each other in life.

2007-02-07 22:02:33 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas 6 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers