christian said 'big bang' is too hard to believe, and nobody was there to witness its happening, but does Bible's creation story proves more believable?
2007-02-07 11:15:11 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not a better explanation... just the one that they WANT to be true.
It's called Doublethink. Apparently the human mind IS capable of telling lies to itself, and making itself believe them. (Well, some human minds are. I know mine has never acquired the skill. I'm forced to wonder if there actually is some sort of "doublethink" gene that some people simply don't have. And those people quickly become realists, free-thinkers, or the dreaded ATHEIST (gasp))
2007-02-07 11:25:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The Big Bang Theory goes hand in hand with the Bible. Eisenstein and a group of other scientists traced time all the way back to within the first few seconds of time (fact) they proved that everything at one time was one solid mass, then someone created some type of explosion and time began, they just didn't know who created what type of explosion and the only logical answer they could come up with is God did it. They were believers in God and scientists and of course Einstein was the greatest genius to ever live.
2007-02-07 12:12:24 · answer #2 · answered by Angelz 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Actually, the "Big Bang" theory and Bible are in accord when viewed in light of Einsteins theory of relativity.
Go to website below for a better explanation.
http://www.levitt.tv/media/links/ZLV-GenesisOne.ram
You can skip the first 45 minutes if you want to get right to the heart of the matter. The guy who is speaking is a Jewish Scientist.
2007-02-07 11:29:29 · answer #3 · answered by akoloutheo2 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is unquestionably no sceitific data for the authenticity of the enormous Bang concept, and the atheists be conscious of it ok. that's like piling up particularly some alpahbet letters and then watching for the entire works of Shakespere to return out of it via an explosion interior the area the place they're piled up! The examples interior the region you have addressed are in simple terms just about as good, and people who say they're relgion-based be conscious of they're arguing as nicely the factor. that's absolutley no greater suitable than that, and if anyone claims that's, enable them to tutor they're appropriate
2016-12-17 04:50:57 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The bible story boils down to "magic happened".
The big bang story tries to take all the available data and fit it into the best possible model and then see how long that model lasts until it needs to be updated based on new data.
I think I'll go with the BB.
2007-02-07 11:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Alan 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It ( the Bible ) states that HE ( GOD ) made the universe, which includes the earth, in (6) six, days. So the big bang does not really actually equate. However, when you compare how the universe is so large to us, it would seem like a big bang. !!
I like the big bang because it really shows how short of time that it was created.
God says " A day in the Lord, is A thousand to man. so believe what U might, but I think that the big bang will have to stay til we have a talk with the Master Himself. !
2007-02-07 11:22:46 · answer #6 · answered by having fun 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
In the beginning, man was lonely - and hated the things he could sink down to, so he created a God in his image. As the god grew in complexity, he attempted to describe all the questions his peers would ask him about this god, and the world with a set of stories.
He could not explain the bones of these great creatures, which had existed, long before he had, so he invented dragons and monsters to justify them.
As his knowledge of the natural world grew, so he amended the story to fit the world he saw, and soon his stories became classic tales, that everybody accepted. And they told his story far and wide.
Problem was that the story was not unique, but one of hundreds of competing stories, all similar. So the followers of each 'theory' would defend it against the followers of other theories. Three of the stories grew very big, and were a kind of Trilogy, but the followers of the first book denied the sequels, and the followers of the second book, tried to wipe out the followers of the other books with holy wars. The followers of the third book tried to convert all to the third book.
In the end, the followers became so blind to the world about them - that when science evolved - and a good theory to explain the world, they clung onto their old superstitions. Many ranting chapter and verse of the good book - rather than using their brains to accept or even judge the new material.
The story even tried to develop sudo science to make the actual facts seem less important, anything to get back to the old beliefs, as they were starting to feel lonely again. They even tried to invent theories to describe dinosaurs, when they could no longer ignore them!
Truth is what a con man will try to hood wink you with, it’s a word invented by religions. Fact is the scientific equivalent, and unlike truth is not subjective, but can stand on its own, and is supported by physical evidence that does not require a leap of faith. Scientology is sudo science - false facts - lies, perverted half-truths to try and justify the bible and a lot of additional strange beliefs.
2007-02-07 11:22:08 · answer #7 · answered by DAVID C 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
The big bang thery is a bunch of cra p, how did life start if a big explosion shot hunks of rock everywhere!?!?!
God created the earth, the universe, and everything in between. The big bang theory is only for people who think that they are so smart.
2007-02-07 11:40:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, given that the Moon is supposed to be a "lesser light", and the stars, some of which are very much like the Sun, are afterthoughts.
2007-02-07 11:42:56 · answer #9 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2007-02-07 11:20:22 · answer #10 · answered by Caveman 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋