2007-02-07 11:03:30 · 6 answers · asked by Pisces 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
im an atheist btw, if that would change how you answer the question, i dont care.
2007-02-07 11:41:12 · update #1
Those who do... where and how do you draw the dividing line between micro- and macro-evolution?
Is there a theory of micro-gravity that keeps us stuck to the earth, and a theory of macro-gravity that holds galaxies together? I just wondered.
2007-02-07 11:11:59 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Liberal 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We rather use the term "variation within kinds" rather than the evolution-loaded word "micro-evolution". The trick here is to get creationists to accept the micro part and then take them to task for not accepting the macro part. We don't have to fall for this ruse.
2007-02-07 21:19:40 · answer #2 · answered by Seraph 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I've met quite a few right here on Answers that most certainly do not.
On the other hand, I don't believe I've ever met an atheist that doesn't believe in it. In fact, I'm not sure that I've ever met an atheist that isn't well educated on the subject.
That seems to be the trend.
Educated = atheist or at the very least, agnostic or moderate theist
Uneducated = theist, to the extreme of fundamentalist
2007-02-07 19:14:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can't answer for all but I do. I think God created all life to continue so they adapt to their surroundings. It's a very intelligent design by Our Creator.
May God Bless you.
2007-02-07 19:09:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes micro not macro
2007-02-07 19:15:37 · answer #5 · answered by redeemed 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't.
2007-02-07 19:58:56 · answer #6 · answered by 0 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋