Ok now that I got you to open my question take a look at my previous question:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AojZ9iDw5AA7uOATUooiZH7sy6IX?qid=20070207134229AAIVVcU
AND TO MAKE THIS LEGITMATE QUESTION:
If there was a new scientific theory of how the world was to came about what would it involve?
2007-02-07 08:59:05 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Still only 2 answers to my other question. Hmmm....I guess noone likes to learn these days....lol j/k. Thanks for all the comments!
I will choose best answer on BOTH questions!
2007-02-07 09:13:51 · update #1
There can't be another alternative, creation is obvious and so is
evolution. What is not obvious is why people can't understand
that they both exist in perfect harmony
2007-02-07 09:04:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Since evolution is a fraud a lie as you and other reputable Scientists have proven absolutely and creation is anAbsolute fact an alternative is not needed and hence if a new theory came up I would check out it facts or lack thereof and go with what I know to be true theories come and go but facts are always facts Gorbalizer
2007-02-07 17:16:09 · answer #2 · answered by gorbalizer 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
First you mention Evolution then you say "new scientific theory of how the world was to came about..."
Uh... abiogenesis is about how the world came about - or at least the life on it. Evolution is just what happens after that.
2007-02-07 17:11:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution is a factual process
Creation is a story
A new theory is developed by a scientist, and he will initially put the theory into a paper with his method of testing this new theory, or his arguments to support it.
His/her peers will then read the paper, and try to repeat the experiment, or evaluate the arguments with reference to their own particular specialisms.
If the theory is not able to be tested, it will wait until empirical research can be devised to test it, however, if deemed credible, it will be published in the academic libraries as a un-established theory.
if tested, then more papers will be published that support of reject it. the main process of science is to try and find faults with new ideas, which gives rise to further questions, or special circumstances where the original theory fails, so it is revised and as more knowledge is gained, refined into a more accurate model.
2007-02-07 17:09:29 · answer #4 · answered by DAVID C 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have never even heard of that phrase in your last question.
Want to hear my new theory? It's basically Intelligent Design, but we were designed from naturally evolving creatures by aliens. Their mistakes are the Yeti, and Bigfoot.
2007-02-07 17:09:34 · answer #5 · answered by Kharm 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Acording to Douglas Adams, it was a race of intellegent mice from another dimension.
2007-02-07 17:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by Randy G 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's called The Big Bang. Evolution has NOTHING TO DO with the origins of our planet.
2007-02-07 17:02:31 · answer #7 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm sorry I only read the headers and I'm in a hurry so
rant rant rant
insult.
2007-02-07 17:02:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evolution is a theory. Creationism is a lie
2007-02-07 17:02:36 · answer #9 · answered by nicewknd 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
? The premises of evolution is scientific fact.
2007-02-07 17:03:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋