aaah , thats p.ish alf. oh sorry thats a number 1 , mc leish.lol
2007-02-07 06:30:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Burns is lucky to have stayed in football as long as he has. He is an imposter and a charlatan. Dire every time he has had a managerial post. The only reason he is still in work is because he is a "Celtic man", and no-one else would employ a man with such a dismal record at the top level.
2007-02-07 08:17:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by dicko 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
Well he certainly was the best man to succeed that traitor Smith as Scotland manager. Unfortunately he had three things that forced the SFA to overlook him.
1 He hadn`t played, managed or supported Rangers.
2 He was employed by Celtic.
3 He wasn`t a mason.
2007-02-07 10:27:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Number too as in little sh it! Maybe. He wa a sh it number 1 with Killie and Reading, although the Sellicks still adore him, although they punted him out quick enough, think they just like ugly losers with red hair!! e.g. Neil Lennon! He didn't do his job in communicating between Vogts and the squad so is a traitorous little turd as well!
Malks, he was a good player for us... in the 1st division but really, he was rank rotten as a manager, the football we played under him was the worst I have ever seen!!!
2007-02-07 07:42:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Sluttty McSluttt 5
·
3⤊
5⤋
i am so glad i know this is sarcasm Alf , but anyway he was definitely the most genuine no 2 who was treated shabbily by the SFA who stumble from one fiasco to the next,then reward them selves at our expence.hailhail,,,,,,,,,sluttteee i don,t know who enraged you ,but your scaring me. Dicko the reason he left Killie was because he,s a Celtic man,plenty of fine managers Celtic men or not think the world of him so come on get over being dumped ,,i know your bigger than that,,.
2007-02-07 08:10:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by malks ra tim 5
·
3⤊
4⤋
certainly the most ginger and miserable. hope his managerial skills are on a par with apparent unhappiness.
2007-02-07 06:20:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by Troubled Joe(the ghost of) 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
No Alf!!! You are at it again aren't you?? xx
2007-02-07 08:07:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
he he! poor wee Tommy,MON MCLEISH!!
2007-02-07 07:47:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by sonny l 3
·
4⤊
2⤋