Live a happier, more peaceful, more progressive life.
2007-02-07 05:15:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Specifically, you would quit believing something just because it is written in a book. You would quit believing it even if the people who wrote it claimed that God told them to write it, because you would realize that just because people claim something is true, doesn't mean it IS true.
You would then learn to solve your own problems, rather than wait for an invisible hand to reach down from the sky to solve them for you. Instead of blaming Satan for everything that goes wrong in your life, you would look for REAL causes, and very often you would find that YOU are the cause, and then you would take measures to correct the problems and learn not to make the same mistakes again.
Next, you would learn to focus on this life as being the most important thing you have, because it is the ONLY life you have and you must make the most of it. This is probably the hardest thing that you would have to accept, because you've grown used to the idea that the next life is going to be nicer and better and so you've put all your focus on it. Since that would no longer be an option, you'd have to actually do something about real-life problems, such as starving children, environmental destruction, and cancer research, instead of brushing them off as things that don't really matter now because they won't matter when Jesus comes.
And that's another thing--you would have to quit believing in the nonsense of a returning savior. You would simply have to accept that after 2000 years, Jesus--who probably never existed in the first place-- is NOT returning, any more than the dead master will return from his grave just because his faithful dog waits by the headstone.
But of course, that will not happen because there are too many people who want to believe in the unbelievable.
2007-02-07 05:21:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Antique Silver Buttons 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe God would have the perfect answer to this question. I know this is not quite the response you were looking for, but I will not even take the opportunity to entertain the idea that there is no GOD. Atheist accept the notion, because they cannot explain anything beyone the realm of logical reasoning. This weakness in their theory of the world is why they are still in the dark about the TRUTH. GOD is life, without GOD there is no LIFE. I pray that they will take the time and the same amount of effort to discredit God's existence into learning truth. There is a proverb that says,
"The FOOL says in his heart here is no GOD." I hope and pray that they will come to know TRUTH AND LIFE.
2007-02-07 05:31:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by sharptech101 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What do you mean “what would we do next”? Human beings would do the same thing they have always done. Besides, it doesn’t matter who won the argument. Truth is truth and there is definitely no god, whether I win some argument about it or not.
People would have to live for their family and themselves (as they should) instead of wasting their lives on delusions.
2007-02-07 05:10:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by A 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
What have you been doing already? No one can prove at this time that there is or isn't a God so why worry about? If there is a God you'd think He'd say something, but that's life. You rarely get what you want or need. So I'm going to have another beer and watch and wait, or not!
2007-02-07 05:09:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million) sensible layout isn't considered technological information, as technological information calls for testability and falsifiability in all hypotheses. 2) Evolution and the conception of organic determination is the most extensively examined and commonplace medical concept in this section. 3) you are able to nevertheless nevertheless count on a diety even as accepting technological information (eg Albert Einstein). 4) both you misspelled God, or you deny the actual shown actuality that persons that settle for medical actuality may have a good time with goodness and morality. In both case, you're incorrect. 5) it does not be truthful for faith to study quite than biology. purely this way of matters is useful in technological information, and that's not faith. 6) How is a watch information that the universe had to be created? And the interest wasn't created in a era. It slowly greater from the hassle-loose gentle detecting eyespots of straight forward animals, gaining in complexity and expertise via each next able era. 7) in basic terms because sensible layout or "DFesign" sounds extra medical than creationism would not make it even remotely regarding authentic technological information. 8) Your "impressionable children argument" sounds like you're saying that the purely way for persons to trust that nonsense is for them to be intellectually defenseless. 9) "propose secular atheists"? end whining. that's not their fault you chosen the dropping crew. 10) the reason creationism isn't taught isn't because of shock, yet because the academic gadget is meant to coach the youngsters. 11) large technological information lies? technological information is the discovery of actuality. not the senseless propogation of lack of expertise which includes that that is applied interior the church.
2016-11-25 23:53:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no argument to win. I don't want to win an argument about whether or not there is a God. I don't think there is. I have seen no proof of it. I would like there to be a God. I just doubt there is one.
The argument I want to win is the one of keeping your religion out of public areas like schools and churches. Why would I care what you believe? Why would I want to win an argument about God?
2007-02-07 05:09:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just because the atheist won the argument doesn't mean there's no God. :)
2007-02-07 05:12:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by hopem 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Son, that just is not going to happen. I know from reading these questions that somehow you all think it will...but in over 2000 years, in spite of persecution and death...it has not happened...and even longer and more violent if you go back to the beginning of the Jewish people. So...I am not going to speculate on what I will do IF it happens. I am more concerned about what you are going to do when it doesn't. BWD
2007-02-07 05:11:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sea of Air 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'd be checking on my closest friends for months to make sure they're doing okay, that they're holding up, that they haven't done any harm to themselves.
Most of my friends would be cool with it but some not so much. It'd shatter their whole world view and I think they'd be lost without it.
However, the sciences would surge, education levels would improve some, and people would start doing kind and charitable things for the right reason -- because they're right, not to appease a deity.
2007-02-07 05:08:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Look at the Atheist nations in the world. What did they do? How is their education? How do they treat society?
Soviet Union
China
Cuba
2007-02-07 05:12:20
·
answer #11
·
answered by Jeanmarie 7
·
0⤊
1⤋