How this century may prove for main three religions, Christianiy,Islam and judsom?

Question

the big stirides of science an all directions may not be easily digested by the religion following lot. A gap is sure to take place. Is is not better idea to slow down the pace of advancement in science.

Answer 1

First, I think that if people can't spell, they probably can't understand the science in which they place their faith.

Second, spirituality and science are not contradictory. It is fundamentalism in any camp that proves to be untennable. Fundamentalists refuse to believe that their position may ever be understood differently. This holds true in science, art, philosophy and religion.

Religion without science is dead. Science, without spirit or art is without soul, harboring neither good or ill. Life without soul leads to indifference, which is by definition, empty. It cares nothing for the suffering or the poor.

Spirit, art, science and philosophy need to work together or all is for naught.

Answer 2

There is no consensus among researchers as to the best methodology for determining the religiosity profile of the world's population. A number of fundamental aspects are unresolved:

Whether to count "historically predominant religious culture[s]"[7]
Whether to count only those who actively "practice" a particular religion[8]
Whether to count based on a concept of "adherence"[9]
Whether to count only those who expressly self-identify with a particular denomination[10]
Whether to count only adults, or to include children as well (see God Delusion#Childhood.2C abuse and the escape from religion)
Whether to rely only on official government-provided statistics [11]
Whether to use multiple sources and ranges or single "best source(s)"

Answer 3

Let's all pick science as our religion! then we can keep moving forward.