Your question is pointless and misinformed.
There is no evidence of Iran seeking nuclear weapons, rather the American media has been using terminology to suggest it, using 'nukes' to refer to their nuclear energy program, which they are openly pursuing, openly so to deal away with accusations they are seeking weapons.
Perhaps you should check your intellect and sources a bit better before exposing your foot in mouth syndrome to the net eh?
2007-02-07 04:22:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by msharp00 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
Recognize that there is no real military option and just add Iran to the us Nuclear strike target list. We might even tell them that any terrorist nuclear incidents of any kind will be seen as an attack by Iran on the USA and that The USA will repond with a full scale nuclear strike that will level all of Iran. Thus the Iranians will know that all they have done is build very expensive dust collectors that give them some power on the diplomatic circuit. Over reaction is much more dangerous than no reaction when dealing with nukes.
2007-02-07 04:34:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by brian L 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ditto with what msharp00 said. And since the Iranian president is so open in his hatred of Jews and denial of the holocost, I think he would be honest about acquiring nuclear weapons. (Not to mention that I don't have much faith in the intel this administration puts forth...does anyone remember the WMDs?)
What's actually going on here? There is a religious leader out in California who has been visiting President Bush. This religious leader believes that a war with Iran is necessary to bring about the "End of Times". Every time he visits the White House, Bush gets more vocal against Iran. So, the real question is, is this why President Bush is pushing this new "Intel?"
2007-02-07 04:26:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by mamasquirrel 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Iraq became no longer a threat. North Korea IS a threat (area of W's *axis of evil*) yet we will not invade it via fact it has NO OIL! Iran is now being concentrated via the neoCON administration via fact it HAS OIL! Pakistan (a meant "best chum") is a fanatical usa with nuclear weapons and yet we will not invade it via fact it HAS NO OIL! this is the figuring out element.
2016-12-17 04:34:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
where do you get the"openly and proudly seeking nuclear weapons" part????they NEVER said they wanted nuclear weapons. they always said they just wanted energy.and after what happened with iraq and the WMDs you should really learn not to trust what you hear from the media and government officials.
2007-02-11 18:58:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ali B 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
John Kerry has already claimed that he supports Iran in their nuclear ambitions (part of which are destroying Israel).
And to the moral relativists who believe that "If America has X, then anyone can have X", the U.S. has not (1) committed human rights violations like Iran has nor has the U.S. (2) threatened its neighbor with destruction.
Distinctions are important.
2007-02-07 04:24:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by C = JD 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
The best way is to eliminate Israels nuclear bombs and then ask Iran to stop its programs.
2007-02-07 04:53:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
democrats will cave...thereby letting iran dominate and intimidate the rest of the mideast and export its radical brand of fascist islamic rule...once this happens...its not too long before the oil situation will become a pawn in the world economic blackmail they will perpetuate on the rest of the world, making our countries accept their backwards laws as "just and needed"...once the mullahs and clerics have got their hooks in, then they will call on all muslims worldwide to make it their eminent jihad to have islam as the major, if not only religion in the world..calling for all nations to come under islamic sharia law...i say bomb them now and send them back to the 6th century...and then let them start again...and when we reach the 25th century, and they are starting to hit the middle ages, bomb them again...just for putting this crap on the world ......make no mistake about it..iran is actively seeking and trying to get nukes...or else they would be more forthcoming with their inspections and not hiding all their activity...or take it underground where it cant be monitored...add that to their rhetoric of erasing israel off the map, and america will apy dearly for any interference with a holocaust of its own...and you definately have a rogue regime bent on exporting its doctrine to the rest of the world....dont believe a word any of the socalled "peacemakers" in turbans tell you...iran is the major threat in our world today and for the near future...
2007-02-07 04:19:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by badjanssen 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
I dont think it matters who wins, Iran will eventually have nukes. Its up to who ever wins to tell them if they decide to use them they will pay dearly for that mistake the democrats probably wouldnt do that.
2007-02-07 19:17:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by firetdriver_99 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
They wouldnt do a thing. They are pacifist and would just allow them to creat the weapons. And when that happens, POOF no more Israel , Iraq, Syria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Quatar, ect........remind me to thank the democrats for WWIII
2007-02-07 04:57:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by raminrobert 2
·
1⤊
2⤋