English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-07 01:32:52 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

17 answers

Well that depends on how willing the religion is to accept science. Some religions embrace science as a way to better understand the universe. Other religions are so dogmatic they will push science aside if it conflicts with their views.

2007-02-07 01:37:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Impure religions change their findings to get more converts to get more funding. Scientists also let their findings be changed by gov'ts to get more funding. So they meet in love of money is the root of all evil(law). Sadly there is no consensus among carnal people, whether they be religious people or scientist people.
http://www.godshew.org/RevelatorySermons10.htm

However when scientists do collaborate, agree, and act on it, then they can make a difference. A recent example of such was when more than a few scientists petitioned parent company Disney, which then corrected the child about an erroneous matter. So perhaps anti-war people should be petitioning the parent of G.W. Bush, since the child is hell bent on warring and sacrifice, when Christ is our "peace" and sacrifice is what God will "not" have, and the not part is not then, not now, not ever.
http://www.godshew.org/GodShew4.htm

Pure religion notably paid a come and go "visit", not a ransom. It notably arrived undefiled and remained unspotted. Selah.
http://www.godshew.org/RevelatorySermons7.htm

Not to mention the end of the God Shew is already written:

The GRACE of our Lord Jesus Christ with you all. Amen.

2007-02-07 01:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

perhaps the true lies in there?, which is the main reason why theories are so popular from scientis and creationist at this time?, though I believed sciences and religion meet more than once perhaps, the material world wasn't yet a reality. So, the best of this yet to come is steal part of the sacred tree, of life, which as you know has the secrets also of good and Evil knowledge?, it bit of faith is needed to accept this theory?, about a tree been sacred and in secret been create to accept this secrets?, I believed so, why???, It will be easy then to say exactly where sciences and religion meet, as well where they will meet again. in space and time. when?, when God decide to do it so, base in the reality that HIM will seam and deam posible for the human world, to run off, with the secrets of life, that will be taking out way from the matter's, and from the substances of matter's, which God will use to create the world, and perhaps took from the dark, and the darkness of Ignorance been produce with-in such Matter's, from negatived and evil doers, Satan and companies, to take use of Elements and substances to pursue more and more mutations from matter's, and elements in a continues efforts to keep the living energies out way from God. sciences meet religion when God Saw and perceived for the first time, the golden energies that where trying to emanate from the living water's, living water's, that where as well cover by the darkness of negative energies using the substances and elements which they where convined in the dark by evil and negatives energies. alchemy is the point in where we can find the emanation of golden energies, though it wasn't a transmutation from lead into Gold, though the darkness will perceived that, to be the case, and why are we to enlight the darkness whit the true?. Not until Jesus and the three groups of followers God will find in the darkness of the matter's are complitly save to continue searching not for the material existence, but, for the more perfect phisical existence and not just a material body, but a physical one that God could have provide for the golden energies to achieved if Evil could have allow the matter's to be use by God to do this, physical creation, from the beginning. <<

2007-02-08 02:50:15 · answer #3 · answered by paradiseemperatorbluepinguin 5 · 0 0

In pergatory?

*chuckles*

I am really not sure, but I'll be doing lots of reading to see what other people have to say about that.

I guess my grandparents who were anthropologists needed to have some type of faith to prove science. So, in a sense, they have to meet. Though, I don't know if it's so much religion as it is faith as religion is a teaching and faith deals with the unseen.

Very good question, though.

2007-02-07 02:00:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I have a degree and work in scientific research and also am a Committed Christian.

In the studies I've done, I've yet to see the two of them as opposing each other. Faith is believing what you DON'T see, and science is believer what you DO see.

I believe that you need both! If scientists didn't have faith, they would not believe any past discoveries at all, they would have to re-discover every bit of scientific knowledge we've collected to date! Who would ever get any work done????

If Christians didn't have observation, how would they learn more about God in their day to day interaction with him?

2007-02-07 01:43:00 · answer #5 · answered by peacetimewarror 4 · 0 1

Harvard and Yale. Both founded by the Puritans and Congregationalists. They teach Arts and Science. Quite expertly, I might add.

2007-02-07 02:00:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

In Paradise

2007-02-07 01:37:21 · answer #7 · answered by Nat Turner 3 · 0 0

Down at the corner pub when no one is watching.

2007-02-07 01:36:53 · answer #8 · answered by Murazor 6 · 1 0

HERETIC, Science is but the work of the devil, and ye shall be condemned with the witches ye admires!

Ah, to the thumbs down recieved, t'is obvious irony is but a spirit in the night, and chooses to settle on naught but the noblest of knights. Shame on ye who condemns me for jesting thus.

2007-02-07 01:36:33 · answer #9 · answered by Mawkish 4 · 2 4

This question leaves a lot to be explained. Do you mean where do they agree?

2007-02-07 01:36:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers