It is most inappropriate for the state or churches to involve themselves in any domestic or personal relationships but that does not mean we have to abandon a proper code of respect towards each other and it is difficult to answer the question you pose as it would require some kind of opinion poll that I doubt this Yahoo scheme could conduct fairly.
That said the issues you raise are important. Lets look at where the anti-church or anti traditional state viewpoints have originated. Freud, an Austrian Jew who could find no takers to his viewpoints in his homeland [especially among his own people] went off to America where he found a most gullible audience prepared to pay him money for all his misconceived ideas and treatments and despite them being discredited as fictitious continue to this day to support his exploitative corrupt erroneous and perverted ideas. While his fellow Jews take no notice of his absurd waffle they have done a great job of jumping on his bandwagon within the media especially Hollywood where they continue to churn out more and more sexually explicit material to corrupt the minds of society on a global level. This of course has given rise to the promiscuous lifestyle we now see, where we now face the problems you raise.
Questions we would pose; is it likely for someone who abstains from frivolous sexual activity to catch a STD or to need an abortion? Does a lack of gun ownership in the UK explain why so few people are killed with them there?
It is not by any means progressive to give children licence to act irresponsibly and is far better to teach them self control and discipline. For a child to require an abortion or to have condoms available in a school is totally abhorrent and demonstrates a collapse of character. To suggest 7 year old should be involved in sex education is definitely paedophilic. It has nothing to do with freedom, if people were really wise they could clearly see they are being exploited by a society that no longer cares for real love but loves to make a fast buck. Freud died of a hideous cancer.
2007-02-14 04:42:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Cool Breeze 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am anti-abortion, and I do not oppose condome machines. Anywhere. What is coverevery? I do not oppose the school making sure contraceptive injections are done on time, pills on time, and I hope schools would do these things and issue morning after pills, etc. I do not call single mothers whores, or their children bas---tards. The only benefeits I complain about are those for the people who just don't try to make a life. I do not support the death penalty. I do not support the war. I am a heterosexual white female with a reputable job.
I can understand some people's being opposed to these things, however, I am not. I believe that if you're going to make a decision to have sex, the materials should be readily available for you to not get pregnant, no matter if it's in a school.
Kids have sex. It's controversial, but it's happening at earlier ages. Think about it. If your child is going to participate... would you rather they get themselves/someone pregnant, or would you rather protection be offered to them.
2007-02-14 20:46:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Barbara H 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow! you sound kinda angry... i believe it's important to teach children sex education in schools however i don't think it's necessary to give away free condoms and birthcontrol pills. I feel this way because sex should be enjoyed when you are a mature adult, ready to get married and are able to face the outcome of possibly having a baby. Children (0-17) are not ready to face commitments like that, granted some are I suppose, but as a majority most are not. I think if children were educated about a healthy, one person sex partner things would take a different route. I don't think this is every going to happen, but I can do my part. Having multiple sexual partners leads to disease (you can't argue that), and I can't argue that having only one sex partner would end abortions, but I think if people were committed to one another they could handle a having a baby. And yes I am against gays, porn, strippers and non prsreational sexual activity because I believe that sex is sacred and should be shared with only one person. I believe in God and I do my best not to be judgemental towards anybody and their choices because it's simply not my place. I just wanted you to get where I'm coming from, and I suppose it would all boil down to love. I know of some amazing dvd's that talk about some issues listed above that might inform you better of why some people are against porn and all that... for being very straightforward in your blog I would hope you could at least be open and respectful of other's choices and values. Those dvd's are called "laugh your way to a better marriage." I hope you at least check them out.
2016-05-24 02:26:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
well, i feel pregnant as a teen who was also on the PILL. I got brought up in social care from a little child i had a bad upbringing, but wen i feel pregnant i was all over the place do i get rid and continue with my life or keep the wonderful human being that i have created! its not easy, and yes i did keep my now daughter who is 6 months old. but i did my education. i have now my own house and living life as it couldn't get any better. i Neva asked anyone for help,money nothing! this is my life and I'm one of millions i think that every one should live there lifes as they should not doing things becoz there friends are? life ain't a draft copy its the real deal and wen we all die we should be proud of what we have had no regrets. x
sorry i did go on a bit. x
2007-02-14 09:34:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by jeanette b 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hard to pin down one single question here but John Doe is correct. The provincial attitudes towards sex education in this country have impeded the distribution of facts to those that need them the most. The 1800's are over. Time to sample reality and educate accordingly. Ostriches have nice feathers but I wouldn't want to be one.
2007-02-07 05:03:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by tempslip3 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Finally...someone else asking the same question.
How do people (common citizens and legislators alike) continue to dance and la-la-la their way around the fact that the teen pregnancy rate here is 9X higher than in the Netherlands, where they take sex education seriously???
Na...better to promote fantasy "programs" like abstinence. Look, unless you're a teen whose parents have groomed you into a "born again," you're likely to have some sort of sexual contact. Should it be safe or haphazard? What's not to understand?
Parents still complain about schools teaching sex education for God's sake, when they don't even do a complete job of it themselves. If they're not going to do it, who is? And who suffers from their failure to do their job?
Ya, this country is seriously messed up when it comes to sexual matters...
2007-02-07 00:55:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Erectile Dysfunction can be devastating to men, and unfortunately, millions of men suffer from the condition. Learn how to cure erectile dysfunction https://tr.im/8X0ac
If you go to the doctor to talk about the issue, you’re likely to get put on one or more of the popular medications used to treat the condition. While they can be effective (temporarily), these medications come with a raft of side effects, some of which are decidedly unpleasant. Even worse, these medications aren’t really a cure, they’re more like a temporary workaround.
Worst of all, they tend to be really expensive. Month after month, you’re having to pay to work around your condition. That’s what the Big Pharmaceutical companies want.
2016-02-16 07:53:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The truth is if most antiabortion marchers and politicians put in as much time on preventing unwanted pregnancies - there would be no need for abortion clinics and there would less venereal disease and fewer AIDS cases.
All they have to do is tell their sons as well as their daughters to say no to pre-marital or extra-marital sex.
2007-02-13 18:01:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have got a really awful mind and think those whom you imply are anti-abortion would follow all what you said above. Maybe you would like them to so that you can have a rant at them. Life is not so simple!
2007-02-07 00:38:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by Plato 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
they probably oppose these things because it is saying to the kids that its ok to have sex when your 13 years old, and its saying that whether or not we support your decisions we cant do anything to stop you, so go ahead have fun
2007-02-14 13:18:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋