All violence has belief at its root. Beliefs that are not subject to rational analysis and criticism are particularly difficult for those of us who would like to try to prevent violence.
Political ideologies such as communism and facism use the threat of violence and force to protect themselves from criticism and analysis. It takes a lot of courage to confront this. Religions usually use brainwashing: it takes smarts and reason to confront these types of ideologies.
Islamo-facism uses a combination of brainwashing and violent threat. This makes it tricky.
2007-02-06 21:19:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL I think I could make a case for Religious Violence is usually Local Wheras ideological base violence usually crosses borders
2007-02-06 21:08:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
at first glance i almost didnt see any difference.
but then i realized that Nazi Hitler Germany had not only an idealogy that was not religious but relgious at the same time.
so following the ideaology of a government, even both an athiest nationality and a humanist secular nationality can be separate and different than relgion. but then again, MONEY can be an ideaology by itself and men will believe in wealth to base a war on. So greed is an ideaology by itself too.
2007-02-06 21:06:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ideology based is wider cause religion is part of ideology...
... so violence related to ideology can be religous or non-religous....
.... the outcome of both is the same... Chaeos... lack of compassion.... misery and deterioration of the human species.
2007-02-06 21:15:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cheers For All 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you actually know what Darwinism means? Most terrorist acts are performed by people who supposedly follow Islam, and it's my understanding that Muslims don't believe in evolution. One thing you said is correct-- using the "cloak of religion" is false. Commiting violence in the name of religion, whatever that religion might be, is false, and those terrorists are not representative of their religion.
2016-05-24 02:25:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
violence is violence
the reason behind the violence is only the difference in words
2007-02-06 21:02:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Peace 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
in ideology fightings if you lost there is no future
in religion fighting if you lost you still believe you going to heaven
2007-02-06 21:18:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by kimht 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
both they had ideology. but affected citizens had life pain
2007-02-06 21:04:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by keral 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are the same.Its all human's doing.
2007-02-06 21:08:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Stefan Kho 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think u know better----u seem to be very violent urself
2007-02-06 21:04:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋