2007-02-06 19:55:05 · 9 answers · asked by Adarsh S 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
mr balasaheb thakaray is an intelligent man. he is of a strong personality.he is a cartoonist he has a very strong way of expressing himself. i cant say if he said the right thing or the wrong thing but isnt the president answerable as to why the terrorist afzal because of whomour jawans died is not yet hanged.
2007-02-06 22:22:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gender has not something to do with it, and invoice has not something to do with it. i'm not so small minded. it is the actuality that difficulty-free wellness care won't artwork. it is the actuality that taxes will flow up, it is the actuality that united statesa. will porbably be vernarable agian like it grew to become into before 9/11. it is the actuality that she is plastic and ameliorations city to city. it is that each concern she sees the answer as extra goverment quite of much less. it is the actuality that issues will only save taking place the hollow, different than now undocumented immigrants would be balloting for america Goverment. it is all those issues and extra. Gender is defenatly not an argument nevertheless. a female could be ust as solid, effectual and sensible as a guy, only not Hillary, she may lead united statesa. right into a socalistic and liberal hellhole, the place highway thugs have weapons yet no person else does, abortions are provided to 10 yearolds and anybody's vote counts, even people who should not be balloting, people who're not human beings. i'm particular i might desire to assert extra undesirable, yet that covers a number of it.
2016-09-28 13:09:55 · answer #2 · answered by puzo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thakre has to be taken as a satirist and a cartoonist who has different way of looking at the truth. His expressions about an event are garnished with a dose of satire and humour.
Hon'ble president is the most respectable person of the country. He is by far the most celebrated scientist, and an honest person without any shadow of doubt. It is his inability to deal with a fact that calls for timely disposal has led to this. It seems ironical that a person of highest integrity can create the presumption of appeasing to a party or the UPA.
2007-02-06 21:35:56 · answer #3 · answered by Ishan26 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
P - R - E - S - I - D - E - N - T. Thats what Mr. APJ Abdul Kalam is. He is the President of India.
Th- Thackrey who? Ohhhh Him. Let him say what comes to him.
The President is too high to be hurt by this man's comments. He is Indian. The other is just a Marathi who has never looked beyond. So let the eagle perch and let the hawk perch.
The question also contains that other thing, "why".
I think he has already specified that the decision takes so much time to come to action because of the other ministries who also have to clear it.
2007-02-07 01:58:55 · answer #4 · answered by Wasif 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Since Thakrey is basically a cartoonist and humorist, his comments were not serious but a light joke
Dont forget it is BJP + Shivsena, who initiated Mr.Kalaam's presidentship
2007-02-06 22:51:12 · answer #5 · answered by ۞Aum۞ 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Thackerey does not have any background. Only backing of gundas. He can talk anything. He is a nuisance in India. He himself degraded and lost the citizenship for 6 years. He should be punished, but scared of his gangsters.
2007-02-06 20:04:09 · answer #6 · answered by Expression 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes,,,
Mr. Kalam is a gentle and loving personality and dont forget his contirbution as a scientist to India.
Who is Thackrey? what did he gave to the people of Maharashtra? only violence and gundagardi..!! why he dont concentrate at the development of Maharashtra instead of giving venomous public speeches just to increase your vote-bank.
He should go to Mr. Kalam and apology to him.
2007-02-06 20:11:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
HE SHUDNT BCOZ KALAM HAS VALUE TOWARDS NATION, WHO KNOWS WHAT CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER OR OBSTACLES ARE THERE TO DECIDE AFZAL GURU'S CASE, BUT NO DOUBT HE SHULD BE PUNISHED
2007-02-06 20:01:05 · answer #8 · answered by chandrU 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you referring to 'idleness'?
2007-02-06 19:59:41 · answer #9 · answered by Invisible_Flags 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋