Which is better digital,regular,or disposible cameras?

Answer 1

Go with the digital. It may be more expensive, but you can keep all your pictures on the memory card and upload it onto your computer and print only the pictures you wish to print. You can also delete pictures on the spot to save room, zoom and set contrast, and do nighttime flash settings. Disposible cameras are cheaper, but kind of useless. A regular camera is okay, but you might waste film accidently taking pictures. Digital is the best, and a good brand would be sony and their cybershot series.

Answer 2

If you take a lot of pictures, digital, no contest. You can delete pictures you don't want, it's easier to not develop unwanted pictures, you don't have to buy film. Oh yeah, once you realize this, you'll be taking a lot more pictures than you ever did with film, just because you CAN.

But to get similar quality to a decent film camera, you're going to need to spend around 150 dollars or more. Preferably around 250 or more.

Disposeable cameras are for when you need a camera but like, left yours at home or something. They aren't something you should rely on if you like taking pictures.

For professional photographers, or artistic photography, film still has some applications. But for the casual photographer, digital all the way.

One thing though, a lot of digital cameras will blur even easier than film. If you can afford it you want one with Optical Image Stabilization. Not Digital, Optical. Digital Image Stabilization pretty much does not work. Panasonic's OIS is okay, Canon's is better. Sony's is worthless. 6 months ago those were the only games in town on the low-end. Now, there might be more.

Canon is the best at pretty much every level, though Kodak and Panasonic have some good ones, too. (If you don't know what you're doing, they're pretty good, if you do know, they're too nannying.)

Answer 3

Depends on Ur use

If Ur the kind that takes photos once a year or something go for a disposable one cause it is cheap, there are less hassles and also cause u dont have to worry about it getting lost in case u r traveling.

If u the type that wants a cam to just shoot family reunions bdays etc with not such a huge budget all u can do is buy a simple auto focus regular cam

If u have a bigger budget and want to go for something which will help u keep the photos forever u should go for a digital one. Though expensive, in the long run it will prove to be very economical.

If u want to take up photography as a hobby and want to know about the working like exposure, focus etc then go for a SLR cam. It is very expensive but if u r serious about photography u ought to get one.

Answer 4

Digital is good for a person who wants to take good pictures but do not want to pay per shot. Film even though is much better than digital, it cost per shot and you cannot see instant previews. Disposible cameras are good for the times when you dont want to bring out your good camera and damage it like camping.

I would say digital is the best overall camera since you can preview and remove pictures you do not need.

Answer 5

You can have the best, and most expensive camera made, but if you don't know how to use it, and look for the best angles, it won't be worth a dime.