Which one makes more sense? Creation or evolution?

Answer 1

Creation dose. Creation is possible where evolution is impossible.

Answer 2

Depends what you're talking about. If you mean "Which fits more logically when compared to the evidence of development in the animal kingdom?" then I'd have to say evolution.

Creation is based upon one thing, the Bible, which already contradicts our knowledge of the age of the world, mankind, animals and presumes to allow a deity to become the origin of all things unexplainable.

If you were talking about the beginning of life then evolution doesn't have anything to even suggest, that'd be abiogenesis (life from non-life), a completely different subject.

Answer 3

If Creation made sense, was all that the believers tout it to be, then you would see Creation science by more than just Christian "scientists" and pseudo-scientists. You would see the studies from scientists across the board - not just Christian fundamentalist but Atheists, Buddhist, Hindus, every religion - which you do with evolution - (there are Christian scientists who support evolution completely)

Answer 4

The creation of all of this through evolution. That the simplistic descriptions of creation in The Bible are not meant to be taken literally. That God gave us science as a gift to understand more fully how he caused all of this to come into being. For example, people that wrote the books of the Old Testament didn't have the knowledge to understand billions of years, so they wrote the stages of creation in a term that they could understand -- days. They couldn't comprehend in detail the way that the stars and planets were created, so they simply wrote that God spoke them into being. Genesis says that God formed man from the clay of the earth -- meaning that he brought man forth from what was already present here. When man reached his full development to what we consider homo sapien, God gave him the "breath of life" -- what makes us specifically different from the animals. Science and faith don't have to always be at odds -- they can beautifully compliment each other if you are open minded enough to see it.

Answer 5

so that you're putting forward that it makes better experience that we are all inbred from a similar 2 people, and that Adam and Eve had youngsters, and the brother and sister were having each and each others youngsters? not in hardship-free words does that not make experience, that is a demanding concept. Evolution not in hardship-free words makes better experience, yet good day, it really is were given some clinical data to again it up. in the journey that your better tender believing a 2000 3 hundred and sixty 5 days previous e book as against some clinical data, it truly is great with me. P.S. Evolution does not say that we developed from monkeys or apes.

Answer 6

"Creationism is not the alternative to Evolution, ignorance is" - John Stear

Evolution is supported by all the evidence, all sciences and mathematics. Creationism is supported by no evidence and requires the refutation of all science and mathematics.

Only evolution makes any sense at all.

Answer 7

Given the evidence? Evolution.

Answer 8

Which came first the chicken or the egg? The answer is easy. The chicken because with any thought or idea you have to have a begining point. So now which makes more sence. Creation or evolution? Creation does because again with an Idea or thought you have to have a begining point. Terfor evolution follows creation. Now comes thecomplicated part (Just how far back have we evolved from)?

Answer 9

Evolution not only makes sense. It is backed up by mountains of scientific evidence.

Creation is a fairytale and in complete conflict with reality. Therefore it makes no sense.

Answer 10

Creation

Answer 11

The one that's fact: Evolution.