No. It makes you an attempted rescuer.
2007-02-06 10:24:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by qamper 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
contrary to popular believe, homosexuality did not start in the dance clubs frequented by gay males in the 70s and 80s but started on the shores of Lesbos off the coast of Greece, when Aprodykie attepted to revive Pamela Anderson...and the result of thier live-saving lip lock is the spread of homosexuals everywhere....
2007-02-06 18:49:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by shhyatt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I bet if a gay woman needed mouth to mouth your ignorance would prevent you from saving a life.
2007-02-06 18:34:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Trying to save a life has nothing to do with one's sexual preference. But what if you found out that your rescuer WAS a homosexual?
2007-02-06 18:35:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Darryl L 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, not if there was no lust involved.
If, however, the performed starts having lustful thoughts or starts enjoying it, then it's gay.
How's that? A serious answer to a non-serious question.
2007-02-06 18:25:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by bradley 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
If I could give you 100 points for a very stupid question, you would have 100 more points!
2007-02-06 18:41:06
·
answer #6
·
answered by melanie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, it just means your trying to save someone's life.
2007-02-06 19:07:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by jetthrustpy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only if they are (more than) comfortable or extra-willing to do it in front of everybody else who is capable.
That kind of person may have ulterior motives.
2007-02-06 18:30:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Nuwaubian Moor 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Of course. Lips touched. Hell awaits.
2007-02-06 18:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
NO! It should make the other persson greatful!
2007-02-06 18:28:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by *Hannah Claire* 2
·
1⤊
1⤋