Yes, again, I would. I know you're doing a clever point-of-view switch, because that's what we're doing to the Iraqis, but still--yeah.
2007-02-06 09:04:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Vaughn 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
It's worked before. It's the normal pattern, and sometimes there are insurgencies, sometimes not. History suggests that one of the best things that can happen to a country is to lose a war to the US, so if I were in Iraq, I'd try to be patient.
2007-02-06 10:33:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You're complaining about curfews? As if liberation should be instantaneous?? LOL
Is your son guilty? Does the Army have good reason for suspecting him? As to "without charge," we're not just talking about suspected criminals. War is different.
What am I being liberated from? An unbelievably brutal dictator who launched wars without good reason, who used weapons of mass destruction without good reason, who murdered lots and lots of his own citizens, who tortured lots and lots of his own citizens?
Who are the curfews aimed at? Lousy terrorists who want to brutally oppress me again?
And when you say "join an insurgency," are you saying that EVERYBODY that resists this invading Army is simply defending their country, nobly?
No, I'd be pretty patient with this invading Army.
2007-02-06 09:08:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
If wishes were horses would beggars ride?
If is the biggest word in the english language. But, I'll answer your question with this question (I like socratic answering!): If the guilty parties were brought to justice would you stop fighting?
Let's also look at the actions of those overthrown:
Uday and Qusay raped 12 year old schoolgirls, and those who tried to refuse were beaten senseless, having legs, ribs, and sometimes even their pelvises broken. They tortured their national sports team if they did poorly. Heck! They even tortured their "friends" who disagreed with them. Sounds like some great rulers! Real gems!
2007-02-06 09:14:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by sjsosullivan 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes ,because they are looking out for the safety of innocent people.I would only wonder why it is taking so long the invade and liberate Iran and Syria
2007-02-06 09:15:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by shawnn 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
between the "alledged" motives for the U. S. Civil conflict grew to become into to free up Negroes or in pc terminology "African-human beings" from the seceeded accomplice States of united statesa.. The Union in no way saved its supplies you and NO regulations to guard African-human beings from lynching have been exceeded by the Republicans or Democrats. human beings nonetheless say that our united states of america did not choose a foreign places united states of america to invade and triumph over for human beings to accomplish all supplies you made on the tip of the U. S. Civil conflict. Jesse Jackson has lost credibility simply by fact of his words and White united statesa. will in basic terms pick White adult adult males of favourite religions or White Washed Non-White adult adult males like Condoleezza Rice. An actual Italian could tell skill US Presidential candidate Rudolph William Louis "Rudy" Giuliani III, you weren't faithfull to your spouse and you inflate your value as politicians consistently do. Frank Sinatra; different than his philandering he in all probability could had in no way supported Rudy Giuliani considering that he grew to become into an ARDENT Democrat. Has united statesa. forgotten that Frank Sinatra by his connections helped John F. Kennedy extremely win the U. S. Presidential election of 1960 in basic terms to be betrayed by the Kennedy prolonged family individuals??? He in no way forgave Peter Lawford,so his public gesture grew to become into to get rid of rigidity. Frank Sinatra ensured that Sammy Davis,Jr grew to become into allowed to stay at "Whites in basic terms" places on the Vegas Strip and in my opinion took him to the wellness midsection while Sammy lost an eye fixed to vicious women individuals. Frank with out hesitation paid ALL expenditures from his wallet. what's this act called: LOYALTY!
2016-09-28 12:33:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would vote for Democrats because I would want my country to fail.
2007-02-06 09:04:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why is Clinton going back to Waco?
2007-02-06 09:04:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
5⤊
1⤋
damn right - and i'm great with a hunting rifle and 500 yards space
2007-02-06 09:05:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by ncblue66 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
grow up
2007-02-06 10:33:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by mcspic63 4
·
1⤊
0⤋