Creation Vs. Evolution?

Question

i know I know what Creationism is, but i need some deep facts about it in order to type up a 8 page essay arguing creationism against Evolution. i know the bible says that god created us, but i need some deeper details. how did god create us. i know the whole 7 day creation thing and adam and eve and all that stuff, i just need something deeper.

Answer 1

Welcome to my lab......

Here are some interesting facts that will help you support your case.

The giraffe as we all know has an extremely large neck. When it bends over all the blood rushes to its head. Well not necessarily, there is a sponge located at the head that absorbs the blood and when the animal stands back up it drains it out. For the giraffe to be an evolved animal there would have been a time when the sponge was partial and it would have killed the giraffes.

The fact that we no longer see evolution. They say they think it is a theory but they say it is science. Well in order to it be science it has to be observable, repeatable and draw a definite conclusion. Evolution does not do this. They say we observe it now but in truth we only see a thing called adaptation. It is where an animal adapts to its surrounding. This is not evolving into a different animal.

The Grand Canyon. They say that the Grand Canyon was carved from a river. Taking a look at the different slopes it shows that at one point or another the river would have had to flow uphill. That we don't see.. so it is false...

Look at the caves.... They say that the stalagtites were formed through billions of years. We have actually been able to make these within a hundred years. So there it proves that it didn't take millions and billions of years... And guess what we repeated it...... Yay now that is science.

The layers of dirt that they say they base the years on. Well we found trees that actually go through layers of these. So it kind of disproves that.

The fossil record..... Ha.. We have found bones in a place called the graveyard where dinosaurs and animals of today and animals that were before them were all mixed together all jumbled up......

Say dinosaurs came before men. We found a footprint with a cethalapod or something like that, underneath it like it squished it.


Half of their evidence is made up. The skull, butterflies on tree. Come on they make it up..

We just keep disproving their theories time and time again..
The tailbone. We found a use for that. The whale they said has that bone that used to be feet. We found that it is used in reproduction. Wisdom teeth. People who don't eat the synthetic foods of today they don't show crowded teeth, cavaties they also have room for the wisdom teeth..

The number one argument is a vast majority of the scientific community accepts it. Well they alos thought the world was flat, sun revolved around earth. bigger objects fall faster than smaller ones etc. they were wrong then soo...

Well i hope ths helps and for more infor watch some videos at

Answer 2

My essay would look something like this (with http://www.answersingenesis.org/storecountryselect.aspx?fromStore=1&origReferer=%2FOnlineStore%2Fgateway%2Easp%3F
as my main source

First of all, the evidence for evolution is mostly hoaxed. Top scientists have looked at the missing links such as Lucy and have found that it was put together wrong. Lucy was only a chimp.

Carbon dating is very erratic. It works under an assumption that the level of carbon 14 to carbon 12 has been the same over the years. It has not.

Then I would argue the point of irreducible complexity. It states that things are too complex to have evolved. The giraffe is a good example. They give birth standing up. The first time one would have been born according to evolution, it would have landed on its head and died right there. However, there are mechanisms that prevent that from happening. According to evolution, it would have taken millions of years for that to come together. According to logic, giraffes wouldn't have lasted that long if they all died.

I would argue the point that some things needed to have been put together are once. In answersingenisis, they love to use the example of the bombardier beetle. Basically, it shoots fire out of its butt to scare off enemies.

Then I would make this point. Out of nothing comes nothing. Everything had to come from something. It's stupid to say that there was always nothing. Something had to have been there. It would have to have been self-existing. If you believe in God, you can say it was Him. If you believe in the big bang, it came from some substance in space. That needed to come from somewhere. But where? Evolution can give no answer.

Anyways, I'd click the link. It does better then I do.

Edit: if you need help, email me. I'd always love to help.

Answer 3

You might want to check out "The Case For The Creator," "The Case for Creation" and possibly "The Case For Faith." I'm not sure about the exact words of the titles, but what I typed should be close enough. All three books are by Lee Strobel, a Christian author who used to be an athiest/agnostic news reporter, so his information is presented in a clear, concise way that's easy to understand. I read a couple of those books a few years ago and I found them very informative and I'm almost certain that they'll have the "deeper facts" you're looking for. Also, I should add that although Strobel is a Christian, he doesn't write his books with a one-sided "yay God!!" attitude. He simply presents facts and leaves it up to the readers to make their own conclusions about how humans and our world came to be.

And, if all elese fails, you can always do a google search for "Creationism"...lol. I hope I was helpful, and best of luck to you in your paper proving we didn't come from no freakin' monkeys!! :)

Answer 4

Not Vs, VIA.
taken from the beginning, God said 'Let there be Light', and BANG! Steven Hawking's vision of the universe came into being. But life from nonlife can only come from the faintest of chances, on the order of 10^-29. You'll want to confirm that number, as it's been awhile. Basically, it COULDN'T have happened without a guiding Intelligence shifting odds for various mutations. Random chance simply is incapable of performing as advertised.

Try going to "The Case for Intelligent Evolution What Language and Communication Theory Says About Naturalism, Darwinism, and the Origin of Species" ©2005 Perry Marshall,

Answer 5

The Bible doesn't specify 'how' we were created; that's the whole point. No one can understand God's methods the way humans understand science, and no human being, especially one who lived centuries ago, can put it into words. That doesn't mean there's no God or that He didn't have a hand in our creation/evolution.

I have read about many scientists have come to believe in a higher power of some sort who must have been responsible for the direction of evolution--there's just statistically no way that all these particles and atoms would have fallen into place to create life, even with millions of years of random chance behind them.

One day to humans is not one day to God (or whatever you want to call Him/Her). "He" exists outside of time. Who says the world is not still being created (through evolution, perhaps, or the part of the process we refer to as evolution)?

Answer 6

The evidence for evolution is and has been interpreted from a Philosophical and ideological Bias, The answers given by adherents to Evolution here in R&S is proof of the bias and agenda, Atheism has to have an alternate explanation—other than a Creator—for how the universe and life came into existence.
Darwin once identified himself as a Christian but as a result of some tragedies that took place in his life, he later renounced the Christian faith and the existence of God. Evolution was invented by an atheist.
What is sad is that Christians are falling into this Trap and trying to fit evolution into the Bible (Theistic Evolution) thinking they can make it fit.
Lee Stroble in his video listed below “ The Case for the Creator” stated (5 min. 28 sec into the video) The Case for a Creator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ajqH4y8G0MI


That “There is no way you can Harmonize Neo Darwinism with Christianity, I could never understand Christians who would say “ Well I believe in God yet I believe in Evolution as well” You see Darwin’s idea about the development of life led to his theory that modern science now generally defines as an undirected process completely devoid of any purpose or plan,”. Now how could God direct an undirected process? How could God have purpose in a plan behind a system that has no plan and no purpose? It just does not make sense.
It didn’t make sense to me in 1966 and it doesn’t make sense to me now.
The Apostle Paul wrote to His Son Timothy stating that “ in 2 Timothy 4:3-4 “For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, [because] they have itching ears, they will heap up for themselves teachers; and they will turn [their] ears away from the truth, and be turned aside to fables.”

Those Christians who believe in evolution have no idea how that effects their theology.
What is theistic evolution?
http://www.gotquestions.org/theistic-evolution.html

Darwin's Deadly Legacy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qHb3uq1O0Q

Answer 7

Considering you are going to be dealing with theories that are science based, I would suggest you continue to deal with theories that are science based. Log on to www.thecreationnetwork.com. You should see a number of articles or referrals that will give you some scientific evidence that points to creationism. You can also take a look at the site from the "creation museum" Here they have many artifacts that show that dinasaurs for example lived less than ten thousand years ago etc. Trying to convince a non believing audience with "faith" just doesnt work.Only those of us who are believers know the reality of it and unfortunately we can't give it to someone else.

Answer 8

The only facts about creationism available are purely theistic, so you're basically stuck referencing the bible and other holy scriptures. There really isn't any scientific basis for the theory. If you want to argue creationism, you need to try to discredit the theory of evolution. There are many resources on the web that try to poke holes in Darwin's theories, some more convincing than others. Good luck!

Answer 9

Instead of "evolution vs. creation", a phrase which does not reflect reality, you would do better to write your paper about how scientific truth and divine truth cannot conflict, and how God creates and works through the natural processes He designed and put into place, including biological evolution.

Answer 10

To argue against evolution you must find logical holes in it. Evolution has not been completely proven. For example, the "missing link" needed to prove man's evolution from apes has not been found. You could site miraculous things that seem to only be explainable by the existence of god. Anything that is evidence of god makes evolution less valid. It's all about the facts, ma'am.