There is plenty of evidence AGAINST EVOLUTION:.
First, the 'Cambrian explosion'...... the millions of fossil types in Cambrian rock (oldest fossil bearing rocks) appear suddenly and fully formed and without any previous forms...IOW, there are no transitional forms.
Most well educated evolutionists, when forced to, will admit it, but very unwillingly, and even then they always want to seem to make new excuses for it. Usually they just don't say anything about it and hope noone finds out.
The thing to remember is that evolution is still just a theory - a hypothesis, a speculation, an unproven assumption.
According to Scripture NOTHING evolved but everything was created "AFTER THEIR KIND"....
"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..."-- Jesus (Mk. 10:6)
Scripture says God SPOKE all things into existence with His Word:
" By the Word of the Lord were the heavens created, and all the host by the breath of His mouth. For HE SPAKE AND IT WAS DONE; HE COMMANDED AND IT STOOD FAST". (psalm 33:9)
2007-02-06 07:50:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Judges
"The stars in their courses fought against Sisera." Unless astrology is true, how can the stars affect the outcome of a battle? 5:20
"As the sun ... goeth forth in his might." The sun, according to the bible, goes around the earth. 5:31
Pick another book. I'll find more. I don't want to list it all
LOL! Job 11:7-9 gives the size of the universe it says: 11:9 The measure thereof is longer than the earth, and broader than the sea. Oh, spot ON!
LOOK THESE VERSES UP! IT IS SOOOOO FUNNY!
Here is the biology it claims supports blood circulation: 17:11 For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.
Did you even look any of these up? This site has to be a hoax!
2007-02-06 15:50:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
So you take a piece of scripture out of context and manipulate the ambiguous words into revealing some startling scientific fact. Very impressive. It worries me that people are so gullible as to believe this nonsense. Correct me if I'm wrong but were plants not created before the Sun according to Genesis- that could create a problem for photosynthesis.
2007-02-06 15:51:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Correction ... Here is what someone thinks the Bible teaches about areas of human knowledge that did not yet exist at the time the Scriptures were written.
2007-02-06 16:12:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by PaulCyp 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
you have got be kidding me. the bible teaches plenty of things that are scientifically wrong such as that bats are a type of bird and the value of pi is exactly 3. you've conveniently left these out though.
as for the things that you DID list, did you even bother to read any of the quotes? under "hydrology", your website lists "snow" as a science. and here's what the bible had to say about the science of snow:
Job 38:22Hast thou entered into the treasures of the snow? or hast thou seen the treasures of the hail,
and
Psa 147:16He giveth snow like wool: he scattereth the hoarfrost like ashes.
where's the science in that?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
and here's what the bible had to say about the earth's rotation:
Job 38:12¶Hast thou commanded the morning since thy days; [and] caused the dayspring to know his place;
Job 38:13That it might take hold of the ends of the earth, that the wicked might be shaken out of it?
Job 38:14It is turned as clay [to] the seal; and they stand as a garment.
here are some of the other scientific insights your website was boasting:
psychotherapy:
Pro 16:24Pleasant words [are as] an honeycomb, sweet to the soul, and health to the bones.
atomic disintegration:
2Pe 3:10¶But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
television:
Rev 11:9And they of the people and kindreds and tongues and nations shall see their dead bodies three days and an half, and shall not suffer their dead bodies to be put in graves.
Rev 11:10And they that dwell upon the earth shall rejoice over them, and make merry, and shall send gifts one to another; because these two prophets tormented them that dwelt on the earth.
Rev 11:11¶And after three days and an half the Spirit of life from God entered into them, and they stood upon their feet; and great fear fell upon them which saw them.
size of the universe:
Job 11:7Canst thou by searching find out God? canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection?
Job 11:8[It is] as high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou know?
Job 11:9The measure thereof [is] longer than the earth, and broader than the sea.
condensation nuclei:
Pro 8:26While as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the highest part of the dust of the world.
glacial period:
Job 38:29Out of whose womb came the ice? and the hoary frost of heaven, who hath gendered it?
gravitation (brilliantly listed under "geology") :
Job 26:7He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, [and] hangeth the earth upon nothing.
do i really need to list more?? i can only imagine that each and everyone of these claims manages to pull off the impressive task of being mind numbingly vague and yet somehow still wrong, but i'm too busy to sit here and point them all out. and i shouldn't have to point them out. you should have read this before you posted it and realized what garbage it is. this website embarrasses all of us.
2007-02-06 16:16:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by tobykeogh 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
The bible holds many truths. Originally, science and religion worked together to understand the world. To impose such proof texting on science is akin to imposing quantum mechanics on the spies who entered Jordan.
2007-02-06 15:53:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joe Cool 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without even trying people can easlily refute the nonsense that "creation scientists" try to pawn off as fact. But I'm not going to your website. If you want to present evidence or open an argument, than do so. I'm not reading someone else's words and then replying to you.
2007-02-06 15:51:47
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The authors of the Bible had no intention of teaching science.
Do I even need to mention pi?
2007-02-06 15:54:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Creationism has no evidence which is what the title of that site implies. I shall not click on that link as it is NOT scientific as you so blatantly claim.
2007-02-06 15:52:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wonder if you really know what atheists believe. My understanding is that atheists are characterized by an absence of belief in God.
Everything beyond that is speculation.
2007-02-06 15:50:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋