http://evolution-facts.org/
2007-02-06 07:18:38 · 10 answers · asked by s2scrm 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No, it's not. Several other tracks like this have been found throughout the world.
2007-02-06 07:23:37 · answer #1 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who knows. The fact is that we don't have a complete picture of the evolutionary map yet, and probably never will. Fossils only form under very specific circumstances, so they are actually quite rare.
Just because we don't have all the bits of the puzzle yet though, doesn't mean the puzzle is wrong. At least science is trying to find answers instead of just blindly being told what to believe.
2007-02-06 15:27:57 · answer #2 · answered by dead_elves 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Catch up, man. The Glen Rose tracks were debunked as being of human origin like 20 years ago.
2007-02-06 15:22:42 · answer #3 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, its from a river bed in Texas. Quite a few dino and man prints have been found in the same levels of limestone. It does not conform to current beliefs by geologists and paleontologists so they don't say much about it. Its considered anomalous.
Just because something is real and true doesn't mean that it will be popular.
2007-02-06 15:21:55 · answer #4 · answered by aarondarling 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Faked, of course. Don't believe everything you see on the net. It's the world wild web also.
2007-02-06 15:22:29 · answer #5 · answered by Irreverend 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-02-06 15:34:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My dear... a big footprint does not mean dinosaur... elephants and people walk today.
2007-02-06 15:21:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
umm let me ask my big purple friend Barney here...
ill get back to you
2007-02-06 15:23:33 · answer #8 · answered by Shellular Kellular 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would say yes !!
2007-02-06 15:21:53 · answer #9 · answered by MR.Truth !! 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Which one is adam??
2007-02-06 15:22:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋