English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I saw a couple with an infant in the back seat and both of them were smoking with the windows barely cracked and it enraged me, so I was wondering about the legallity of it. If it is not illegal it should be!!!!

2007-02-06 06:12:30 · 5 answers · asked by Jesse R 2 in Pregnancy & Parenting Other - Pregnancy & Parenting

5 answers

Wow, I sure do hope so! I have heard rumors that outlawing smoking in cars (children or no children) is not far off.
I just hate watching litterbugs flick their nasty lit cigarettes out the window - not only should they be slapped with a fine for littering, they should also be arrested for attempted arson!

2007-02-06 06:19:02 · answer #1 · answered by LadyJag 5 · 0 2

No it should not be illegal. I smoke in the car with my child and it is my choice as a mom to do so. I don't care if it enrages you.

2007-02-07 11:14:55 · answer #2 · answered by Karen L 7 · 1 1

No, i do no longer think of so. How a ways are you prepared to bypass; interior the abode, interior the front backyard, with in 50ft of people? look there's a reason smoking is "appeared down upon", and there's a reason it has no longer been thoroughly banned. the commonplace state tax on a million p.c.. of cigarettes is $a million.04; this is according to p.c..! regardless of if it is so risky, and risky to those around you why do no longer the states ban it altogether? by using fact they might't stand to lose the tax base. And what of the huge settlements to the states from the tobacco agencies; they have been meant for use to offset the fee of offering well-being guard people who smoke. yet, in Colorado those money have been used interior the T-Rex challenge in Denver! And later the state opted for a funds purchase-out of the settlement for yet another street shape challenge. the reality of the priority is which you may desire to be thanking each smoker you spot for paying for the roads that we force on! i do no longer try this by using fact i'm professional-smoking, that is by using fact i'm anti-vast brother. If smoking somewhat is as undesirable by using fact the government says this is, why do they permit the sale and use of such products; by using fact they are making economic company off of it, and that's the bright hipocracy. whilst the government can adjust what we do with our persons, and our property, then there is not any freedom, and we live in anarchy. they might bypass after people who smoke now, yet whilst this is long previous; who will they sick their regulators on next? bypass forward, help the limit of rights, determination, and freedom on people who smoke; yet do no longer initiate complaining whilst the government tries to take over some component of your existence, like wearing sandals. I propose for sure sandals do no longer grant the comparable back help as boots, and the fee of offering well-being care to those who've worn sandals, atleast as quickly as of their existence time, is astronomical. First they might help be attentive to "you shouldn't", then comes the "you may no longer". And whilst that day comes, the people who smoke might have the potential to enable you be attentive to "I instructed you so".

2016-12-17 03:50:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I hope so! People that smoke in th presence of a child are putting that childs health at a serious risk. It is being considered in several states, including California. Check out the article below.

2007-02-06 06:27:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

It should be.

2007-02-06 06:28:58 · answer #5 · answered by lillilou 7 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers