How can people believe in the 'BIg bang theory'?

Question

How can people believe in the 'BIg bang theory' how can the Universe have been created by none other than a creator- God plus peoepl have had this 'theory from when people could write so therefor there must be a God, who will answer to people who believe in other theories come judgement day! I understand that some people find it hard to put their faith in to some thing that they can not see but if people have to see hard evidence for proof then what hope have they got? Do people have to see to believe?

Answer 1

People have free choice and choose not to believe IN GOD(the LIGHT) because they love darkness in which to do their evil deeds unless they should come to the LIGHT(JESUS) see the truth of their sin, turn from their ways and be made free."Know the TRUTH(JESUS) and the TRUTH will set you free." So they look for anything else(A lie) so they can hide from the truth and continue to sin.

Answer 2

How could people believe the world is round?
How could people believe that the Earth rotates around the Sun, and not the other way around?
How could people believe there were actually dinosaurs before mankind?
Science has proven all the above, while the Big Bang is a theory, it could be proven. Is this to say we don't need God or religion? No, for the Bible is a tremendous account of history, and people still have a need for hope; remember there are no atheists in a foxhole. So don't get all upset with what people believe, for if there is a judgement day, your safe and me(and a few others) are screwed.

Answer 3

Your question is actually a bit confusing.
I think what you're trying to ask is:

Why do people believe that the Big Bang Theory is a fact?

The "Big Bang" theory is just that, a theory. It has never been proven. That is why it is called a theory. People who believe it as fact are sadly uninformed. There is currently so supporting evidence for it. It is just an idea.

I think that people choose to believe that it is fact because they are lazy and don't really want to spend anytime really thinking about why they believe what they believe. It sounds good to them so they figure they can go with it.

It is not a matter of not having faith. Actually, to believe that the world came from a "big bang" requires a much LARGER step of faith then to believe in God as the creator. Why? Because there is a lot more physical evidence that supports creationism than "big bang". To overlook all the evidence requires a much larger step of faith. So faith is not the issue.

I think the real issue is that to believe that God created the world means you have to believe that God is who He says He is and therefore would require a level of commitment from people that they are not willing to give. Again, laziness.

Everyone is looking for the easy way out. It's much easier to believe that we came about from a giant accident than to believe that we were created for a purpose that we might actually have to do something about.

Answer 4

Blessed are those who have faith and do not see. I personally believe that there was a big bang, but that big bang, was created by the Lord God. Now, when I say the big bang, I mean that everything was created in a flash, by the Lord in 6 days, on the seven day He rested.
I think people that people have been to reliant on there own strength, and forgotten what God has done for them. Many evolutionist are begoming open to the relization that God did create everything about 6,000 years ago, and not billions of years ago, like many believe. I hope you can impact others to the relization of what is fact and not fiction. Blessings.

Answer 5

Observations have PROVEN that the universe is expanding.

The speed of light has been measured very accurately and knowing that value, along with proven concepts like parallax measurement which tells us the distance from earth of the most distant objects, we can determine the age of the universe as many billions of years.

People didn't just sit around bored out of their skulls one day and make this up. It's taken generations of research by dedicated people to begin to see how the universe works.

Despite all this history and tradition, you need only show proof that a theory is incorrect to convince the scientific community to seek a better explanation.

That's the beauty of science. It not only seeks evidence, it recognizes it, and holds it up for all to see and criticize.

Answer 6

The "Big Bang" is not a theory, and almost nobody believes in it as a source of creation.

The concept of the "Big Bang" is simply an acknowledgement that the universe is expanding from a central point, as occurs in an explosion. It does not pretend to explain what the catalyst is, but rather helps to define the present nature of the physical universe.

It would greatly benefit you to learn what non-believers think before trying to contradict them. If your goal is to influence intellectual people to a spiritual decision, you're going to have to do better than that!

Answer 7

If people have to see to believe, why would they believe in the big bang theory? They didn't see it. It can't be proven. I like a Tshirt I saw one time, "I believe in the Big Bang Theory. God said let it be, and BANG it happened!" Now there's a theory that can be proven, and scientists have proven over and over. Some even admit it. :) Have a wonderful day.

Answer 8

People believe in the big bang theory as a result of discovering that the galaxy is expanding....And when they see that its expanding, they come up with the theory that, long ago, it came from one single point.....and that with an explosion, came the galaxy.
It sounds more convincing than an invisible God that nobody's ever seen, heard, or has any proof that it exists.

Answer 9

Ever heard of multiple universes? Our universe didn't need a creator. Cosmologists view the universe as an intricate tapestry that has evolved from the initial conditions that were imprinted in the first few microseconds after the Big Bang. Complex structures and phenomena have unfolded from simple physical laws. Simple laws, however, do not necessarily lead to complex consequences.

Our universe could not have become structured if it were not expanding at a special rate. If the big bang had produced fewer density fluctuations, the universe would have remained dark and featureless, with no galaxies or stars. And there are other prerequisites for complexity. If our universe had more than three spatial dimensions, planets could not stay in orbit around stars. If gravity were much stronger, it would crush living organisms human sized, and stars would be much smaller and shorter lived. If nuclear forces were a few percent weaker, only hydrogen would be stable: there would be no periodic table, no chemistry and no life. On the other hand, if nuclear forces were slightly stronger, hydrogen itself could not exist.

Some would argue this “fine tuning” of the universe is proof of a creator. There is however another explanation. Many universes may exist, but only some of them would allow creature such as ourselves to emerge. The seemingly ‘designed’ features then are just a result of evolution on the grandest of scales. Perhaps our big bang wasn’t the only one. This speculation dramatically enlarges our concept of reality. The entire history of our universe becomes just an episode, a single facet, of the infinite multiverse. Some universes might resemble ours and most others would be “stillborn”. They would collapse after a brief existence, or the laws governing them would not permit complex consequences.

Answer 10

Easy simple all you need is to have a PhD behind your name and say it is so.
Now with string theory and when the notice the universe is not slowing the explaination. Not to mention that gallaxies are coming at each other from opposite direction. Kind of flys in the face of 1 big bang.

The great thing about theories we keep learning like evolution with our present understanding it is the best explanation we got going.
Yet if you say evolution is theory to the evolutionist freaks they will come unglued.