I heard that the Bush administration found the imaginary weapons of mass destruction in 2003. Do you think?

Question

they could help me find my imaginary purple kitty? It's cold, and she needs her pretend medication for her imaginary diabetes.

LOL! The liars and fantasists just come out of the woodwork like the vermin they are! Hey, wingshooter, did your son find the holy grail and the lost ark too? I think I saw him in the movies!

ANother thing: Let's say that the weapons were discovered as some of you claim. Why isn't the Bush admin claiming this triumph?

Q bert: I don't want to say you're a liar, but... I don't know how to end that sentence!

Seriously, I don't even know who you are. WHy should I believe your "eyewitness" testimony when even the Bush admin has no knowledge of what you're talking about? And another thing: did you find them, or were they spirited off to Syria? Get your story straight.

Q-bert: Where's your proof? You're merely making assertions. And why won't you pet my kitty??!!

Specifically where are the documents? What did they say? Where are they mentioned other than here, by you? Where are the munitions mentioned? WHat kind of munitions were they, specifically?

That is if I am to charitably assume you are not simply making all this up. Show me an URL or a google search, or something. And still I ask why doesn't the Bush admin just publicize all this and destroy the credibility of degenerate peaceniks like me forever?

All speculation and hearsay.

Lesse there was movement on the Syrian border that might have involved WMDS. An Israeli says that Syria might be storing them. No hidden agenda there, huh? And Rick Santorum claims that unspecified WMDs have been found, but we're too dumb to know what they are exactly.

And still I ask, why does FOx, worldnut daily, and the moonie times know things that the bush admin itself doesn't?

Add who in the hell is CNS news??

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Cybercast_News_Service

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post-Saddam_WMD_search

If you can have worldnut daily and cybernut news service, i'll keep my wikipedia and sourcewatch. Anyway, chemical and biological weapons do decay, unless you also know more than weapons inspectors.
http://www.wilpf.int.ch/disarmament/biologicalweapons.htm

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Inspector_Kay_testifies_that_degraded_chemical_0630.html

Answer 1

Your ignorance is all too real. More than 500 munitions were found containing mustard gas and sarin nerve agent. Guess if you actually listened to what was going on instead of listening liberal trash, you would know.

Also, documents pulled from Saddams own intelligence building stated that WMD's were a priority and were moved during the seven months that the UN sat on their asses.

What is sad is that someone like you is so into your own little "world" that reality to you is imaginary. Your sad.

Before you go off saying I "imagined" it...I was there. Were you?


Cardinal Fang, You are right on par with Ignorance as well. Educate yourself and become at least worthy of us listening.


Edit -

Claiming what triumph? That we went in and found them? That was the mission. We found them. The press simply refuses to acknowledge that evidence was found. Democrats flaunt the false notion that none were found. Why? politics. The press and the Democrats hate Bush and the Republican party so much they would let a nuke wipe out the estern seaboard to make him look bad.

Let me ask this, did the Republicans cry "cheat" when Dems won the election? But when the republicans wo the Democrats were right there with lawyers in tow to protest the ballot...



Good lord...are you dense? over 500 munitions found by US forces (yes, I was there, we loaded them) - STOP-

Documents were found in Saddams Intelligence building stating that WMD were to be moved in the seven months the UN did nothing -STOP-



You really should learn to do some research, but i'll give you the benifit of the doubt and presume that you truely don't know hoy to use a computer even though you are on Yahoo!


The links I have provided below. My only wonder now is what you are going to say to call all the information I have given you "imaginary"



It's fact. Hell, there are scans of the actual documents and their translations. But I should have know you are liberal...all talk and no facts. Since it does not agree with your point of view, you shun it.

Your just all speculation and hearsay...no fact or backing of it. Your a sad little girl....maybe you should move to France....I hear they love people like you. Bet you spit on Soldiers when they come home too huh? Yea...figured you did.

Your not an American, your an oxygen thief, stealing air from real Americans.


Bottom line is really quite simple. No matter what I post, you won't believe it. If I showed you a video of WMD's leaving Iraq by the truckloads, you still would deny it.

As far as the administration not "gloating" about it, it's not what they wanted. They just wanted it known and the rest was considered OPSEC....something that keeps Soldiers in the field alive.

Hope you come to your senses one day...but I won't count on it.




For Brian L..... Chemical weapons don't go innert. Seriously...do you two go to the same school? I mean really, are you both that ignorant?

For the record...I am NOT a bush fan...I pretty much dislike most of what he has done, but I will continue to support my Nation, her Troops and her people. SO, no...this isn't a defence for the administration. It's fact for our Soldiers and Country.


LoL...you use a liberal left site to rebuttal news? Please. i noticed there was nothing in there about CNN jeapordizing US Spec Ops by meeting them on LZ's or the CNN officials that were in and knew of Iraqi forces and dangers for US troops but said nothing to maintain press relations with Iraq. How about CNN reporters sitting with enemy artillery crews firing on American video taping it. No, that proves nothing...sorry.

Wikipedia is about as reliable as a childrens book about the war. Once again, a sorry source. Speculation and hearsay is all about Wikipedia.

Keep trying.


Headed to a meeting...was fun. I'll probably argue with you in some of your future questions...heads up

Answer 2

It seems the right wingers are afloat today. However there is a kernel of truth in what they say. Some munitions were found BUT!!!! these were left overs from the Iran/Iraq war and were worthless as weapon as the ingredients inside had long ago gone bad. The whole lot would fit on one pallet with space to spare. So no the mighty WMD's the President was talking about never existed after 1991. PS I send Xoxoxo to your purple kitty and i hope your kitty gets well soon.

Answer 3

Weapons of mass destruction don't just mean atomic or nuclear bombs. Chemical and biological weapons are also in that category. Which we did find a cache of mustard bombs that would fit this description. But because we didn't find any nuclear bombs, everyone assumes that we didn't find any WMD's. people forget the past so easily. I guess it's because their hatred of Bush blinds them from the reality. we've done everything we said we were gonna do over there. this sectarian warfare was unexpected, but it doesn't mean we should just leave because the hard part of this conflict has arrived.

Answer 4

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

Answer 5

Considering that I personally saw a couple of the chemical warheads - I would say that you need to do some more reading.

Hint: we found and destroyed over 500 of the things.

Interesting you you call eyewitnesses: "liars" if what they saw disagrees with what you desire to be true. I suggest that you take a thoughtful look at yourself.

Answer 6

i am the imaginary sadaum and i know bush knows i have weapons of mass destruction because he still has the hand reciept ,, damn dont the U.S.A ever through away old papers ha ha ha good one

Answer 7

Not imaginary, though I know you would like to thnk so, my son spent two years in Iraq and was one of the troops that found the chemical and biologial warheads still intact on a set of three missles.He sent me pictures and eveything, pretty cool. So go ahead an stick you head in the sand again and enjoy that kool-aide!

Answer 8

HAHAHAHA, I love it. Guess all the trucks leaving the WMD sites to Syria escaped your short attention span. Thank god you are not in charge. But, since America is a free country enjoy your life of rosecolored glasses and no brains.

Answer 9

I would ask you the same question. Do You Think?

Answer 10

They found 9 shell casings with traces of mustard gas that were over 10 years old (i.e. that were ancient and non-functional) and tried to use them to justify the illegal invasion of a country that posed no threat to them and the subsequent death of over 100 000 innocent Iraqi civillians.