Why, and what would you talk about?
a. Martin Luther - Catholic Reformist
b. Joseph Smith - said he spoke with God, Jesus, and angels
c. The Pope - Current Catholic leader
d. Charles Darwin - Championed natural selection and evolution
e. Mahatma Gandhi - Pacifist Leader
...assuming you could of course. Also, are there any you would avoid?
2007-02-06 05:52:28 · 10 answers · asked by neil_ritz 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Try to avoid saying Jesus and "none of them" as neither of these are included among the options.
2007-02-06 05:54:17 · update #1
Why do you think you could even serve such men with your disgusting stolen 23%?
2007-02-07 04:56:09 · answer #1 · answered by GODZILLA CHICKEN 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I suppose Martin Luther would be the most interesting of those choices for me. He had a rather radical idea at the time about what Christianity should be. I'd love to know more from his perspective about what that time was like for him. I don't know much about Joseph Smith (unless I learned about him in college and just forgot, lol), and I don't think the Pope would be all that interesting for me. He wouldn't be able to answer my questions without referring to books I don't believe should be included in the Bible, so we'd come to a head. Charles Darwin would just be one of those boring science types. :) My eyes would start to glaze over when he started using the scientific names for stuff. I wouldn't mind listening in on some of his conversations, but I'd rather sit near someone else so as not to get trapped into the boring parts. Mahatma Gandhi would be my second choice next to Martin Luther. I suppose he'd be second because he was around much more recently than Luther. I could probably just learn more about him and his ideas through researching on my own. He'd be a really close 2nd though.
2007-02-06 14:00:30 · answer #2 · answered by elizabeth_ashley44 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gandhi. Amazing man. Such courage. Such principle. Such accomplishments.
Martin Luther is admirable, too. Joseph Smith, no interest. The Pope, no offense, but no interest. Charles Darwin, I respect him, but no interest.
2007-02-06 14:02:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
A. pass
Joseph Smith is just too tempting. I would love to figure out what made that whack job tick.
Pass on the pope...
D&E are both equally tempting, but I just have to revert my attention back to the car wreck that was Joseph Smith. I can not look away.
2007-02-06 14:03:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The pope. He is the closest to a genuine philosopher of the bunch, and he would find me very interesting also. I have needs!
The rest might be to blinded by their own emotional needs to listen to a word I said. I like Philosophers much more than activists.
2007-02-06 14:00:52 · answer #5 · answered by Real Friend 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'll go with Darwin. I'm fascinated by his theories, and I'd love to discuss 'The Origin of the Species' with him.
2007-02-06 13:59:18 · answer #6 · answered by irish1 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Gandhi, because I would try to save money on food. A little rice, and he would be happy.
2007-02-06 13:57:20 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Luther loved to drink. He was rather rowdy for his day.
2007-02-06 14:01:26 · answer #8 · answered by Aspurtaime Dog Sneeze 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
meh, id rather none of them. if i had to pick, probably Darwin.
2007-02-06 13:56:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Could everybody come over?
I think THAT would be MOST interesting....
'specially if we have sushi...
2007-02-06 14:00:47 · answer #10 · answered by carwheelsongravel1975 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋