The bulls in the glass shop are the Russians and the Americans....not the Iranians....lol. Strategic nukes are the planet killers. The most we can expect out of Iran is one or two in the 100 kiloton range...if that....trust me, neither Iran or NorKor will reach continental US..
2007-02-06 17:54:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its not me Its u 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are numerous options available before that kind of response would conceivably be taken. Even a limited nuclear exchange would endanger the oil supply from the entire region. The hawks wouldn’t mind going in, no matter the cost, but this ultimately comes down to money and who’s actually pulling the strings. Bush. I don’t think so. It only takes one look at the top earning companies to figure this one out. It’s not in their best interest at this time to expand the Iraq war to Iran. If they can find a way to make a profit from it then you can start to worry.
2007-02-06 04:38:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by tempslip3 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The spark will be triggered by the U.S.. Only the U.S. has the capability to drop nuclear bombs on both Iran and North Korea. Dropping nuclear bombs or missiles that could reach the continental United States is way beyond Iran and North Korea's technological capability.
2007-02-06 05:11:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by roadwarrior 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes of course they would respond with nukes, China and Russia wouldn't get involved over Iran, but Pakistan would. The loser would be Iran and the planet's atmosphere.
2007-02-06 04:08:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doz 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
I believe the spark will ignite in Korea. The North is desperatly short of supplies and will need to invade the south to keep themselves alive. We will stand up for the south and china will stand for the north. All hell will then break loose. However i do believe the china and korea would lose.
2007-02-06 04:42:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robert P 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
low-level nuclear weapons will not ignite the apocalypse.it would take a massive,global response with high-yield thermo-nuclear weapons on all continents to achieve that scenario.
2007-02-06 04:19:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by slabsidebass 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
If Bush is at the wheel, then we'd respond with a raining down of a-bombs, cos he clearly doesn't care about the consequences of his actions. Let's pray for another Clinton, girl up there, at least when he lied it was only about his BJ!!
2007-02-06 04:13:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by N.FromVT 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
The USA will respond in a half way....and yes they think that they will be all right as long as America is dead.
2007-02-06 04:12:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by flowerpet56 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
The US wouldnt ever respond with nuclear attack unless it was unavoidable. Even then iam sure it would be on as small a scale as possible.
that is, if we can keep another clinton out of the white house.
2007-02-06 04:08:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by amosunknown 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
No one lives forever anyway.
2007-02-06 04:20:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
1⤊
0⤋