haha., you are so dumb
2007-02-06 03:57:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by layjc01 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
Cute.. Except of course that "earth" is a hominym -- it's a word that has two different meanings. It can mean the planet "earth" or it could mean "soil" -- "Pick up the earth and pack it in tight around the plant." -- "Salt of the earth" "Earthen homes." Thus, to the extent that we humans would continue to use the word "earth" to describe soil, then a disruption of the soil would still be an earthquake.
Sorry to be so literal. :)
2007-02-06 04:36:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Perdendosi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most likely they would be. Seeing as to how they would be occuring on Mars and not Earth.
2007-02-06 04:01:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by lifesajoy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, just like if there are quakes on the moon then they would be called moon quakes you are 100% correct. The first person who commented is a moron.
2007-02-06 03:59:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Doz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
hahaha. Lol. I suppose they would. If it was even possible to have earthquakes on Mars.
2007-02-06 04:04:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Richbitch 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2007-02-06 03:58:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by gimpalomg 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
And if you were relaxing on Mars, would you be a marsmellow?
2007-02-06 03:58:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by True Dat 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
haha yeah, and when they errupted it would be all caramel and creamy stuff coming out of them, like a mars bar, instead of lava.
2007-02-06 03:59:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by ciara_e2007 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
actually they just call them quakes.
Great question though. keep up the witty repartee!
you get a star!
.
2007-02-06 03:58:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by USMCstingray 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It makes sense.
2007-02-06 03:58:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by ♥ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds right to me.
2007-02-06 03:58:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by JAN 7
·
0⤊
0⤋