English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

17 answers

haha., you are so dumb

2007-02-06 03:57:54 · answer #1 · answered by layjc01 3 · 1 3

Cute.. Except of course that "earth" is a hominym -- it's a word that has two different meanings. It can mean the planet "earth" or it could mean "soil" -- "Pick up the earth and pack it in tight around the plant." -- "Salt of the earth" "Earthen homes." Thus, to the extent that we humans would continue to use the word "earth" to describe soil, then a disruption of the soil would still be an earthquake.

Sorry to be so literal. :)

2007-02-06 04:36:50 · answer #2 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 0 0

Most likely they would be. Seeing as to how they would be occuring on Mars and not Earth.

2007-02-06 04:01:13 · answer #3 · answered by lifesajoy 5 · 0 0

Yes, just like if there are quakes on the moon then they would be called moon quakes you are 100% correct. The first person who commented is a moron.

2007-02-06 03:59:09 · answer #4 · answered by Doz 2 · 0 0

hahaha. Lol. I suppose they would. If it was even possible to have earthquakes on Mars.

2007-02-06 04:04:23 · answer #5 · answered by Richbitch 3 · 0 0

Yes.

2007-02-06 03:58:29 · answer #6 · answered by gimpalomg 7 · 0 0

And if you were relaxing on Mars, would you be a marsmellow?

2007-02-06 03:58:51 · answer #7 · answered by True Dat 4 · 0 0

haha yeah, and when they errupted it would be all caramel and creamy stuff coming out of them, like a mars bar, instead of lava.

2007-02-06 03:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by ciara_e2007 2 · 0 0

actually they just call them quakes.


Great question though. keep up the witty repartee!
you get a star!



.

2007-02-06 03:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by USMCstingray 7 · 1 0

It makes sense.

2007-02-06 03:58:49 · answer #10 · answered by 3 · 0 0

Sounds right to me.

2007-02-06 03:58:31 · answer #11 · answered by JAN 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers