2007-02-06 01:01:53 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not necessarily, yet it can make it more enjoyable for the answerer. Clipped or generous responses do not seem to be favoured, as long as the response is in agreement with the questions veiled conclusion, then that would be more of the pre requiste from what I've observed. I sure have enjoyed the humour I find in all this! Take care.
2007-02-06 01:20:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes verbosity fits the question. As in your case, I would say that verbosity is a natural and consuming inflection that should enhance the answer because of the mocking tone in which you've injected within a question you have posted here.
My condolences.
2007-02-06 09:08:18 · answer #2 · answered by Guitarpicker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Verbosity, extremely poor grammar and spelling, 1337 cut and paste skills, the ability to turn every question around on the asker, and the ability to ignore any other views. Then you'll be an R&S pro.
2007-02-06 09:08:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I shouldn't think so - have you not noticed that many of the responses, to questions posed in this category, lack verbosity?
2007-02-06 09:06:48 · answer #4 · answered by unclefrunk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
As long as one doesn't get overcome by the exuberance of one's own verbosity.
2007-02-06 09:06:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
No but sometimes complex misconceptions require more that a smart as$ remark to untangle them.
Love and blessings Don
2007-02-06 09:07:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yup
2007-02-06 09:04:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some people think it is the best way - cut and paste 2,000 words plus.
What a bore.
.
2007-02-06 09:13:11 · answer #8 · answered by Plum 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In some cases... unfortunately YES!
2007-02-06 09:12:25 · answer #9 · answered by Screamin' Banshee 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only for people who want to sound smart when they don't know what the hell they're talking about.
2007-02-06 09:06:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋