No not really.
2007-02-06 00:03:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hi 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It just says it was a coincidence that he predicted it. How many of his other predictions never happened ? People tend to ignore that part of the picture. First of all, scientific evidence supports man's involvement in global warming. Secondly, the rest of it is really off the wall and quite the fantasy. Wow, he was really off the deep end.
2007-02-06 00:06:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gene 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah it tells me just like every other prediction that has ever been made that if you make enough predictions eventually some of them will come true, besides Global warming was around back in the 70's as well wasn't even a prediction back then it was fact as well and man has made a difference on the effects
2007-02-06 00:04:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Aw come off it, we all knew about global warming in the 70s.
And we knew about that other great enivronment disaster, the depletion of the ozone layer, by 1980. I remember attending a lecture in 1980 on the exact chemical reactions involved.
2007-02-06 00:18:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by Gnomon 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, that tells me nothing except that one aspect of his nonsense actually came to pass. anyone can yell random things all day and chances are that at least one will happen given enough time.
as for global warming, the method used for measuring the earth's temperature has a greater percentage of error than the amount the earth's temperature has risen since 1880. we call that a statistically insignificant amount.
to the person suggesting you watch an inconvenient truth, i suggest you read the "real" inconvenient truth here: http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/
2007-02-06 00:08:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dashes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Here's an excellent article that tells the real origin of the theory of global warming. You'll see it was an established idea long before Elijah Muhammad supposedly predicted it:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/outlook/4528385.html
Signed,
AC (who will NOT be moving to Antarctica!)
2007-02-06 00:21:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by A C 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
certain, he may be incorrect, or merely misinterpreted, or it could be that he change into precise, and his calculations contained in the international cooling sort were someway shown maximum acceptable, and that credibility carried self belief that a normal reversal of a few indicators (- to +, etc) ought to convert his findings to be utilized in international warming fashions. Isaac and Al? that is taking it somewhat some distance i imagine. Mathematicians and politicians merely paintings jointly even as compelled to, frequently to the intense of being at gunpoint or the like LOL.
2016-11-02 11:33:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
global warming is natural, but humans pushed it above normal. the temperatures we're at are not normal.watch "an inconvenient truth"
2007-02-06 00:02:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by laura03125 3
·
0⤊
1⤋