What are the scientific evidences for the story of Genesis?

Answer 1

Science has nothing to do with Genesis. Genesis' like every book in the Bible is the Word of God.

Answer 2

the ingredient to keep in recommendations about God is that His time isn't our time. Time as all of us comprehend that is a convention of guy for obtrusive convenience. (2 Peter 3:8) at the starting up, i'm a Biologist and a Believer. i trust that the enormous Bang idea coincides nicely with Genesis. the area that technology typically unearths with conception in creation is truly one of time. I examine the somewhat lengthy answer above and that i see the point, yet how does it instruct that God did not create the universe. that is a mistake to degree God's note in common words hostile to the limitations of the authors of the Bible. I happen to also disagree with the idea that faith is all we pick. If that were the case, we does no longer be having this digital communicate.

Answer 3

First the word evidence is an uncountable noun and so the question should read "What is the scientific evidence..."
There is absolutely NO scientific evidence whatsoever for the story of Genesis. All the material put forward by the creationists is, if you analyze it with care, nothing more than quotes. taken out of context, deliberate lies and the usual plethora of junk used to try and baffle brains with bull***t

Answer 4

if you mean, when taken literally does genesis make sense, then no. No evidence at all, in fact, a lot of evidence to the contrary.

But as far as creation myths go it's more or less on par with the rest. It's a story people.

Answer 5

There's tons of creation myths, just because Christians banned all the other religions doesn't make their version 'right', it just makes it forced and corrupted. We don't have any talking snakes around, so if genesis is suposed to be taken literal it means that ancients communicated with animals and that could mean that the Pagan 'mythologies' with Gods, Gaints, Dragons and other strange creatures walking among humans could also be 'true'. If it's all just based on belief, you can really believe whatever you want.

Answer 6

Get the book "Genesis and the Big Bang: The Discovery Of Harmony Between Modern Science And The Bible" by Gerald Schroeder. He has a doctorate in Earth Sciences and Nuclear Physics from M.I.T.
http://www.amazon.com/Genesis-Big-Bang-Discovery-Harmony/dp/0553354132
http://www.geraldschroeder.com/gbb.html

EDIT: Hmmm, three thumbs down...some people must really hate science...

Answer 7

We all descend from one mother "Eve" this has been demonstrated by scientists tracing the mitocondrial DNA of all people to one woman long time ago.

Part from that Genesis is sacred scripture not a scientific paper, 2 different litarary genres answering different questions.

Answer 8

Wow Tracy seems confused, doesn't she?

So the word of God has nothing to do with science - and I'd argue, reality.

So is a fundamentalist arguing that God does not exist, I must have misunderstood.

Answer 9

No.Creationist has nothing to back up themselves.

To Spetznuts,the oldest rock found on earth is 4.6 billion years old.The rock found on the moon are much more older than this.
How does this cofirm genesis?

Answer 10

Mr Science fellow, there is a quite a bit of geological evidence for a world wide flood,archeology has found many of the ancient cities mentioned in the Bible, the Tower of Babel, and the oldest writings ever found, in Northern Iraq and near the cities of Ur, show that man not only was using writing at much earlier times than thought, but that the first religion recorded was monotheistic, a belief in one God only. If you actually researched your pet theories you could answer a lot of your questions.