English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-05 21:37:43 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

its called breaking down the equation folks.....its another angle that most refuse to look at!

2007-02-05 21:51:05 · update #1

15 answers

Yes and no. Christians take the bible literally where it's MEANT to be taken literally and symbolicaly/metaphoricaly where its MEANT to be taken that way. EXAMPLE: When Jesus said "if your hand offends you, cut it off, and if your eye offends you, pluck it out." He was not being literal or espousing self-mutilation. He was saying to get rid of anything in your life that was causing you to sin or hindering you from obeying God. As for atheists, I'm not sure. Its been 33 years since i've been an atheist. I mean, I remember WHAT I believed then, but for the life of me, I can't remember WHY I ever believed it. Its all so irrational to me now. I mean, I've been over all the reasons I called myself an atheist back then, and they are all so silly and superficial. I've never met an atheist (including myself from back then) with a logical or rational argument for their position that would hold water for more than 2 minutes. 99% of atheistic arguments deny common sense (it takes LIFE to begat life: from NOTHING, nothing can come. 1st Law of Science & and common sense). And ALL of them deny proveable science. I can't understand how I ever swallowed it to begin with. Probably thought it was cool or liked the idea of being "a rebel". Well anyway, I hope that helps, at least as far as the "christian" part of your question.---theBerean

2007-02-05 22:18:41 · answer #1 · answered by theBerean 5 · 2 1

Christians have believed the Bible and everything taught to them since they were born, which is why they put so much emphasis on hings going in the world, they have religious upbringing and for some people, what they learn while growing up is what they learn is righ, without a question, never giving thought, just dismissing other people's religions because they conflict their own.

Atheists, who don't believe in a God, don't view reality literally, some of them are really spiritual people, thogh not in the sense that you could think. While they could not believ in God, they believe other things, and also want to know the answer what occurs when you die, so really, they are both the same, except the only different is that atheirsts don't devote their lives to God and shaping their life arounf (Her/him, like a lot of Christians do.

2007-02-05 21:44:51 · answer #2 · answered by Lief Tanner 5 · 2 1

those are the prophecies with reference to the Jewish Messiah: * The Sanhedrin would be re-common (Isaiah a million:26) * as quickly as he's King, leaders of different international locations will seem to him for coaching. (Isaiah 2:4) * the full international will worship the only God of Israel (Isaiah 2:17) * he would be descended from King David (Isaiah 11:a million) via King Solomon (a million Chron. 22:8-10) * The Moshiach would be a guy of this international, an observant Jew with "worry of God" (Isaiah 11:2) *****In different words - this might desire to all be achieved in a human lifetime***** * Evil and tyranny is in basic terms no longer waiting to stand in the previous his management (Isaiah 11:4) * understanding of God will fill the international (Isaiah 11:9) * he will contain and entice people from all cultures and international locations (Isaiah 11:10) * All Israelites would be decrease back to their fatherland (Isaiah 11:12) * dying would be swallowed up continuously (Isaiah 25:8) * there'll be not extra starvation or ailment, and dying will end (Isaiah 25:8) * all the lifeless will upward push lower back (Isaiah 26:19) * The Jewish people will journey eternal exhilaration and gladness (Isaiah fifty one:11) * he would be a messenger of peace (Isaiah fifty two:7) * international locations will finally end up recognizing the wrongs they did to Israel (Isaiah fifty two:13-fifty 3:5) * The peoples of the international will turn to the Jews for religious coaching (Zechariah 8:23) * The ruined cities of Israel would be restored (Ezekiel sixteen:fifty 5) * weapons of conflict would be destroyed (Ezekiel 39:9) * The Temple would be rebuilt (Ezekiel 40) resuming lots of the suspended mitzvot * he will then appropriate the full international to serve God mutually (Zephaniah 3:9) * Jews would be attentive to the Torah without learn (Jeremiah 31:33) * he will provide you all the needs of your heart (Psalms 37:4) * he will take the barren land and make it passable and fruitful (Isaiah fifty one:3, Amos 9:13-15, Ezekiel 36:29-30, Isaiah 11:6-9). attributable to Mark S and Plushy undergo and Ruth as quickly as lower back, i might desire to factor out that the Messiah is a distinctive concept in Judaism. we've an entire and friendly faith without a Messiah; Christianity won't be able to exist without the Messiah.

2016-10-01 12:23:16 · answer #3 · answered by clarice 4 · 0 0

There are parts of the Bible which use symbolism but most of it is to be taken literally. I cannot speak for an atheist because I have never been one. (Thank You Lord that you have choosen Me)

2007-02-05 21:46:36 · answer #4 · answered by Godb4me 5 · 0 1

Is there another way of viewing reality? My impression up until now that not seeing reality for what it is has a name: Psychosis.

2007-02-05 21:58:53 · answer #5 · answered by link955 7 · 1 0

literal has the same root as literary, and their meanings are connected. perhaps you would do better to say that atheists take a realistic approach to understanding.

2007-02-05 21:45:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

You are mostly right. The difference is that there are highly analytical Christians who are critical of some biblical stories!

2007-02-05 21:40:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm Christian, and i don't take all of the bible literally.
I also take the real world literally.
So no, It is not true.

2007-02-05 22:48:33 · answer #8 · answered by Skippy 5 · 1 1

Snap!

Literalism is essential in science, but as absurd in religion as it is in art..... or love.

2007-02-05 21:54:31 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

That's not even a question- you're just rewording a statement to get attention. (Just like everyone else in this category. Totally pointless).

2007-02-05 21:43:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers