2007-02-05 19:09:20 · 13 answers · asked by ? 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The only reason the Americans blow up the English tanks is because the Canadians aren't there to shoot... It's not the first time The American troops fu*ked up and I know it won't be the last... Maybe that's why The Canadians are smart enough not to be in Iraq with the Americans... (Canadians don't want to get shot by the gun ho American troops like the last time)
Signed,
CANADA
2007-02-08 14:30:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no reason for Americans to blow up English tanks. They didn't do anything to each other.
To the first answer, expect to be insulted for your answer.
2007-02-06 03:15:24 · answer #2 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure you have any idea what you are talking about. But if you do, I would think it is because we like for you to know that we haved saved your sorry english asses in every war that is relevant in recent history. Blowing up english tanks is good American fun. Do the english even have tanks? I thought that, like the canadians, they just relied on the kindness of The United States of America to protect them from everything.
You are welcome,
Signed,
The United States of America
2007-02-06 03:18:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Why would we blow up English tanks?
Come to think of it, do the English even *have* tanks any more?
2007-02-06 03:18:47 · answer #4 · answered by dukefenton 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They don't because their s h i t t y little Abram's can't even penetrate the armor on the British Challenger 2 tank.
Floyd m you can shut your mouth the Americans didn't save the English in any wars,in fact it was the English who saved your sorry butts in all of the wars.
2007-02-06 12:53:03 · answer #5 · answered by HHH 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They are like the THING car of 30 years ago. UGLY and should not be allowed out in daylight hours as it scars cats, dogs, children and other living things. Plus nothing is more disgusting than to see a man(?) sipping tea with his PINKY sticking up, sitting atop his manly(?) tank! You guys need a good, ice cold LONG NECK! HOOOOOOOOOOOOYAH!
2007-02-06 15:22:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah genius why would the US intentionally blow up a tank of one of its closet allies. Give it a rest it was an accident.
2007-02-08 04:17:18 · answer #7 · answered by firetdriver_99 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolute hooey.
Anyone who cares can easily discern that the US military, especially in Iraq, operates under the most stringent fire control ROEs (rules of engagement) in the history of modern warfare. Their are blue-on-blue incidents because the US is attempting close in, precision combat with an embedded insurgency in Iraq. By doing so, the exposing themselves to extreme danger and increase the chance for blue-on-blue incidents. If they were like most other militaries in the world, they would engage from a distance with stand-off weapons, greatly reducing risk to their troops, but greatly increasing collateral deaths of civilians.
Some Brits have a very unhealthy and uneducated anti-American bias. Please don't allow yourself to be drawn into that ill-informed crowd.
2007-02-06 03:38:17 · answer #8 · answered by RealistProse 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Friendly fire has always been a hazard of war, but, you would have thought that with all the technology available to the military, and the millions of dollars spent, they would have the common courtesy to hit the correct target. I bet those pilots still pi.s.s on the toilet seat to. Incredible.
2007-02-06 03:32:23 · answer #9 · answered by dingdong 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Probably for revenge since America lost a lot of those piece of c*** Shermans in WWII and now they think it's something rational
Americans are anyway of this type but there's nothing that can be done.
2007-02-06 03:45:19 · answer #10 · answered by Coverup guy 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋