English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I see there's so many of pople here who can't belive the existence of God, or somekind of "Supreme Power". These people based their lifestyle on Scientology,or etc.

But I saw that some of people like these still have this argument in their own mind :"I think I can agree if God is exist, IF ONLY I can see one 'proof' about it". Do I right? Some of you? Well, if I goes wrong, don't answer this question.

But, if I right, plz, tell me what kind of proof that you'd like to watch, so you can agree that God is exist? (I said only agree about the existence, not about to follow, okay?). I really mean it, only a proof that will change your mind, that God is exist. So, don't give some answer that if even it happens, you still don't believe the God is exist.

For example: "I believe if God is exist, if only He can raise up again my long pass grand mother",etc.

Thx a lot

2007-02-05 17:57:41 · 17 answers · asked by Stanley R 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Okay, first I admit that I have no idea if the science has so many BIG differences with scientology.
Second, I'm sorry about my english, coz I'm Indonesian.
Third, some of you allready point what proof they want. I hope it's happens.
Fourth, I ask this, simply coz i'm curious. Like Yahoo! Add : "Got Burning Questions at head?"

2007-02-05 19:51:07 · update #1

Credit to The Outsider! He gave a lot of informations. But I can't give him a reason to be the best answerer, coz he doesn't answer my question.

Mr |.|, oh you can wait to the time when the **** is comin to you.

Cool Deux, God is not assumption. Still, God is a fact. At least, to each mankind, God is a fact. Unfortunately, some of human being has a bad fact or experience about God. That's what i want to know.

2007-02-07 19:34:54 · update #2

17 answers

Whoa, hold on... that's a completely baseless assumption. Personally I would NEVER follow Scientology. It's a cult, a dangerous, greedy, vicious one.

There couldn't be any proof for a being that, by all accounts, couldn't logically exist. There can NEVER be sufficient proof of that which does not exist to be proven, conclusively or otherwise.

2007-02-06 07:31:11 · answer #1 · answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7 · 0 0

God is so yesterday. It's hard for me to believe in a single deity controlling everything, but I do believe that we are all connected in an intertwining fabric. The proof that I seek is being able to control space-time and dimensions. Being able to control my surroundings wouldn't make me God, but it would give me proof that there is a hierarchy of power and order. If I were to achieve that status, then I would believe in an up and a down, higher and lower, divine and mortal. The reason why I say this is because I tried to kill myself 2 years ago but I didn't die, or at least in my perception I didn't. I sometimes think we fall into levels of existence - maybe this world is another world's hell.

Either way, I say show me a passage to the tenth dimension and there we will see God. Show me someone who uses 100% of their brain and there we will see god. Show me a type 3 civilization traveling the cosmos using exponential probe production and we will feel God. She me a world where we all tap into the Schumann resonance and we will hear God.

2007-02-05 18:09:57 · answer #2 · answered by MarcusChi 2 · 0 1

Your grammar is a little off the mark but your question is sincere.I feel the logic is faulty.God should have done more relevant things to help mankind. I will be blasphemous to you but I could do a better job than God. If he is a supreme being I expect so much more from him.

If this life is all I have I want to experience it to the fullest.I don't want to live my life to someone else's expectations only my own.

2007-02-05 18:05:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Sorry...scientology is a cult founded by L. Ron Hubbard. I believe you mean to say science...the 2 are profoundly different.

There is only one proof that I would accept. For god him/herself to come down, and in my direct presence take a handful of dirt, and create one fully functioning, self aware human being...without a navel.

2007-02-05 18:44:36 · answer #4 · answered by Bill K Atheist Goodfella 6 · 0 0

First, scientology is a vicious business/cult. It's got nothing to do with science.

Second, anything that would be completely impossible by natural means. For example, the planets reversing their course. Just one of them, even.

2007-02-05 18:05:06 · answer #5 · answered by eldad9 6 · 3 0

Whoa whoa whoa there, buddy. Scientology is a CULT and not science at all. Anyone who is intelligent hates scientology. God does not exist. There is no proof that anyone can give unless I can look god in the eye and he can show me himself.

2007-02-05 18:04:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

I will believe that God exists if he can teach you to write that entire schpiel again, using correct grammar and spelling, in the next 2 minutes. That would be a true miracle.

2007-02-05 18:06:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

You are aware that Scientology and science are two completely different and unrelated things, aren’t you?

And that scientologists believe in god?

You haven’t really thought this through, have you?

2007-02-05 18:02:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Honestly, I'm not sure there's anything anyone could show me that could change my mind. There are so many ways to fool people nowadays; almost anything can be faked.

2007-02-05 18:16:01 · answer #9 · answered by Jensenfan 5 · 0 0

Enlightened people know that God is not He. She, and it also do not apply. You don't need proof, just reasoning and inner thought.

2007-02-06 12:30:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers