English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

A rough figure will do, taking into account terrorist bombs Hzballah rockets and "collateral damage", e.g. in recent war on Lebanon. I make it about 1000 to one but that seems excessive

2007-02-05 15:50:28 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

12 answers

Good question you have over there.

Last summer Hezbollah kidnapped 2 soldiers and didn't even touch them and they strike back by killing 1000+ Lebanese.

Where is the love and where is the peace of the world???

2007-02-07 15:32:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

even as develop into the perfect time a Qassam rocket killed an Israeli. None lately. Tit for tat implies an both matched warring parties. that could no longer the case; that is a one side conflict. Any end fireplace involves the Palestinians being forced through the international community to end any direct moves. Israel can't be forced so it continually keeps a low element grind of assassinations, mass arrests and aggressive incursions to take carry of Gazans on the line to procedure by way of their defense force prisons. This very last element of 'disappearing' is a psychological attrition tactic to gut Palestinian society. traditionally Stalin and Pinochet employed the technique of 'disappearing' a human being going about their lawful organisation to weigh down community spirit.

2016-11-25 19:31:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Wow, man. I'm not sure where you're going with this - whether you are pro or anti Israel.

Some questions for you... Does Israel have the right to be displace the Palestinians? Do you believe that the Palestinians can be at peace with the Israelis and share a border? Do you believe that Israel has more rights over the land than the Palestinians? Is it acceptable to suppress the Palestinians as if they are prisoners in there own land?

2007-02-05 16:06:13 · answer #3 · answered by sk33t3r 3 · 2 0

Well actually last year the IDF killed 660 Palestinians,while from the militants attacks have died 23 Israelis...In Lebanon 1000 people dead,while Hezbollah killed less then 44 civilians and about 120 Israeli soldiers(some were killed by friendly fire)...So you do the math...

2007-02-05 18:30:35 · answer #4 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1 0

Well, I remember that when a Zionist terrorist killed about 27 people who were praying in Hebron, he said: " A thousand Arabs don't worth a fingernail of A jew". But that's too much! Let's say that for every Israeli 20 Palestinians have to be killed.

2007-02-06 10:27:40 · answer #5 · answered by MagicWand 3 · 0 0

Hmmm.... that much huh? Maybe somebody should have sold Hezbollah some more advanced Rockets and missiles to fix that, or maybe Syria should just make a pre-emptive strike on Israel when it wasn't looking. That would be interesting, lets see how they like it when they have thousands of people who hate them pouring over you border, and they cant call in planes, cause thier runways were gone.


Israel couldn't just push Hezbollah around like it could Palastine, Hezbollah could strike back, thats why it is 39-1. Too bad, it should be a smaller number like 1-1, sounds even to me

2007-02-05 16:33:30 · answer #6 · answered by Sean 2 · 1 1

Last time I checked it was roughly a 39 to 1 ratio but that may have changed. From what I understand, it is a dangerous practice to harbor terrorists and allow them to promulgate rocket attacks on Israel. Some people learn quicker than others I guess.

2007-02-05 15:54:12 · answer #7 · answered by Lt. Dan reborn 5 · 1 2

Both sides are wrong. Hzballah attacks territory that is rightfully that of the palistinians. Most americans do not understand that the "Neighborhoods" attacked are not neighborhoods at all. They are built in violation of article 49 of the geneva convention which states that "Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive."

The land is illegially occupied, as the UN stated in 1967 that israel must withdraw, it has yet to do so.

However these illegal establishments are not called that, they are called "jewish neighborhods" on the air due to immense pressure on the media by the jewish lobby and other watchdog groups. I should also mention this land on palestinian territory is for "jews only."

The US continues to blindly support one side of this case. Anyone who disagrees with this policy is labeled an anti-semite and silenced. No politician will stand up to this because of fear of reelection.

2007-02-05 16:04:37 · answer #8 · answered by Interested 4 · 3 2

I'd say one to one actually, anyone fighting over religious differences are all equally worthless in my book.

2007-02-05 17:35:23 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hezbollah and Hamas will keep on hiding behind civilians while they attack Israel, so the ratio will keep climbing. Most of those dead civilians' blood is on the hands of Ahmadinejad, who arms, trains, and funds the terrorists.

2007-02-05 16:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers