if it was able to be put on the market would your purchase a full-auto glock 22 with a 29 round extended clip? wether it would be for personal use or illegal activites would you but this weapon? keep in mind the glock 22 uses a s/w .40 caliber bullet
2007-02-05 13:14:04 · 11 answers · asked by synth 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
Not having shot one (yet) I would figure it isn't made for target shooting. .40 has a good combination of speed and power which is probably why a lot of governments are switching to it.
But having fired full automatic weapons before I don't see the practicality of it for personal protection.
All full auto is good for is the thrill of firing a whole bunch of lead in a general direction, which would be especially true for a Glock handgun. An Uzi or a Mac 10 is hard enough to control with the stock. I could imagine trying to hold a full auto Glock.
2007-02-05 16:41:41 · answer #1 · answered by JOHN 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all if the conversion can be done,and I think it can be on the Glocks,and if I had the money then I would. And also your question seems to insinuate that there is no legal way to own said gun,which is incorrect,it is perfectly legal if you get proper permits and live in a local area that doesn't forbid it,and if you have no criminal record of course.
AD
2007-02-05 13:22:02 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, automatic weapon fired in the fully auto mode are not accurate at all. It looks good on tv and the movies, but all the average guy does with these things is to make noise and blow smoke. I have fire fully auto weapons, and I know from experience.
2007-02-05 23:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by WC 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would've been Survivor Series 1993 but I taped it on my VHS and saw it the next day as I did with many PPVs when I was younger and I can honestly say that I can not remember 1 single match from that PPV! The only part I can remember partly was Undertaker and Yokozuna wrestling outside of the ring
2016-03-29 06:54:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
What in the world would I need with such a gun?
I own a .22 rifle for hunting, as well as a shot gun, and that is all I really need. Anything else would be unnecessary.
2007-02-05 13:27:03 · answer #5 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would buy it for personal protection. Not that I need it but it would be nice to have when these sleeper cells wake up and start destroying my country
2007-02-05 13:17:53 · answer #6 · answered by Travis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sounds like fun, but not particularly practical. Count me in.
2007-02-05 13:27:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Guns are for weak, that's why when people say they hold a gun, they feel a confidence of energy flowing through them. No I would not purchase a gun, unless it was for protection.
2007-02-05 13:18:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
protection in a house 1 gun and 1 rifle.... the gun if you think the guy is in the house, the rifle if you think the guy is outside the house
2007-02-05 14:33:14 · answer #9 · answered by Dont get Infected 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would--registered to myself, and use for protecting my family.
2007-02-05 13:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by jakkibluu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋