2007-02-05 09:45:19 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Games & Recreation ➔ Gambling
Hellmuth. Definitely. Mike can be unbelievably annoying, but there's usually some humor behind it. Phil is just a *****. He cries and whines and complains, and wants everybody to treat him like his sh!t don't stink. I don't need to hear about how badly I played a hand when I win. Matusow is usually just generally annoying, Hellmuth is personally insulting.
2007-02-05 12:18:40 · answer #1 · answered by Bigsky_52 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh lord you asked a hard question, I watch Poker After Dark, everyday on NBC and last week one of them was on it and I cant stand either of them. I would say Mike is more annoying cause he will start singing in the middle of a hand sometimes, and if I was playing against him it would be hard to read him, I think Phil is much easier to read, but they are both definetly in the top ten most annoying poker players I have seen on tv.
2007-02-05 10:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by Andy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would pick Mike Matusow as the more annoying because you can "sometimes" understand what feelings Hellmuth is trying to convey.
2007-02-05 09:56:21 · answer #3 · answered by BIGAUS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love to play either. But i would rather play helmuth cause he bluffs less.
But i would love to talk with them
2007-02-05 17:55:43 · answer #4 · answered by Bill F 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
mike the mouth!
2007-02-05 13:19:44 · answer #5 · answered by Bullet 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I play with both, wearing my IPOD.
Take care
2007-02-05 11:25:27 · answer #6 · answered by pokercoach 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say do not gamble at all!
2007-02-05 11:18:41 · answer #7 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋