agnosticism? the logical choice?

Question

i am not an agnostic neither i will be.But i believe so...

Bad example ''bad liberal''. See, i believe in fairies.

Answer 1

Logically, I think you are correct. Since there is no reason to believe in god but since the non-existence of god also requires belief, agnosticism logically makes sense. Given the choice between two ideas, neither of which can be proved, none of the above is a logical response.

Answer 2

In a sense yes. The agnostic understands that the existence or non-existence of the Almighty can be neither proved nor disproved. If you take "proved" to mean test tubes, and working hypotheses confirmed or denied (the scientific method) then it seems clear that the agnostic has the reasonable answer. That is, that "science" strictly so called is not an appropriate tool for studying religion. However that does not imply that the Almighty does not exist, it is simply a comment on the shortcomings of science, as applied to this question.

Answer 3

I feel that Agnostic is the closest thing for me..I believe there is some type of God overlooking us.
I think the bible is amazingly retarded,
i think that heaven and hell are made up to encourage people to believe in their God.
I think that any miralcle or act of god that happened back then was simply early man not having enough commom sense to know what was a bad dream, a lie, a magic trick.
But we are all here for a reason and everything happens for a reason. But nothing is in control of that but you.

Answer 4

i'm a theistic agnostic, and that i would not attempt to transform relatively relatively everyone. it relatively is their determination. i might say that on account that no person can teach the life or non-life of deities that relatively everyone might desire to have some tiny doubt. if it relatively is the case, then everbody already *IS* agnostic in one way or yet another. there are various forms of agnostics. with a bit of luck in this text would be of use to you. Gnostic: you're no longer answering, you're ranting - there's a huge distinction. What we are able to do approximately it relatively is to offer you a thumbs right down to hide your non-answer.

Answer 5

In light of the world we live in and the persistent frustration and confusion that the media builds for us, I think it is a pretty "logical" choice... If it is indeed a choice.

Answer 6

yes it is and it's a totally rational choice based on the lack of evidence and facts of all arguments and why wouldn't you be agnostic do you think that you are better then agnostic people

Answer 7

uh yeah for the most part.

agnostics claim its impossible to prove that god exists, and that he doesnt exist. *shrug* it is the only truth about religion.

for those that disagree, they obviously havent come to terms with the fact that u cant prove it either way.

believing in god is faith that god exists, disbelieving in him, is having faith he doesnt. agnosticism is the only one that realizes this. for the record, its not fence sitting, some agnostics believe in god, some believe there is no god, but they still conclude it cant be proven. =P

Answer 8

as for logic, the only logical choice is atheism as i see it. i can just simply not fathom the existence of something that has no proof beyond the shadow of a doubt. it is similar to comparing something as outrageous as pink unicorns with an elephant head, a goat tail and human ears. people can try all they want to justify it, but it still has no proof, nor any credence.

Answer 9

Agnosticism? the logical choice= YUP for me it is- I used to be Catholic, and then I woke up..

Answer 10

I know many agnostics and it was the logical choice for them. I say - if it works for you and best describes your beliefs, go for it.