English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I honestly just don't get it. I was watching a show on Evangelicalism today the minister was talking about how proof of Dinosaurs came from the bible, and that they were talked about in there. This obviously is interpretation at its worst.

After the lesson they interviewed the kids and my heart broke for these little brainwashed minds. If a parent chooses to do this on their own I suppose it is their business even though I think it is criminal, but in know way should it even be argued that this be taught beside scientific evidence of the age of the earth, or the evolution of dinosaurs.

2007-02-05 09:43:35 · 8 answers · asked by snocy 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

8 answers

There is no religion in schools. The evidence of dinos IN THE BIBLE lacks any credence of validity. If you choose to send your children to a Christian school...make sure you understand its curriculum fully.
The Christian GBY.

2007-02-05 09:51:52 · answer #1 · answered by Dust in the Wind 7 · 2 1

The div/ide between CREATIONISM and EVOLUTIONISM is still in the forefront.
Although, I do grant both sides their perspective inside the classroom, presenting a perspective as neither pro / con SHOULD be expressed inside the classroom.
I try to explain both perspectives inside the classroom where I teach, giving the students the open window to decide on thier own.
%I explain "Charles Darwin researched _____ this way" and The Bible explains it this way..."
I usually close each lesson by saying "THE STATE requires this lesson be taught like this and THE CHURCH says ______."
I let the students decide.

2007-02-05 10:00:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Hello snocy.. :)

It depends on "which science" one is speaking of..for the Bible speaks of science also.. :)

Now we must ask ourselves, can the science that speaks of evolution teach our children manners, show them how to respect others..can it teach our children morals..

The science of the Bible does just that..so how is that criminal..

Is it not more criminal "not to teach" our precious young children Love, forgiveness, gentleness, tenderness, kindness and respect..

I will choose to raise my children with respect, forgiveness, tenderness, kindness, gentleness and most of all Love.. :)

For when we raise and nuture our sweet children in the ways of Lord, how is that hurting them..

Why should they not be taught beside one another..

I have heard from many parents here, that say that they let their children make their own decisions..so what has changed.. :(

I say all this in Love.. :)

In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ.. :)

2007-02-05 10:07:44 · answer #3 · answered by EyeLovesJesus 6 · 1 0

To deny a child access to a scientific education should be criminal. The child should be given the right to choose their beliefs and teaching them only one idea is denying them the right to choose.

2007-02-05 09:53:35 · answer #4 · answered by God Fears Me 3 · 2 0

No. There’s no longer something incorrect with faith being taught at your residence or on your inner most college. particular it’ll harsh your mellow yet that’s your determination. the problem I (and a tremendous variety of others) are having is that all of us belong to a club (referred to as the u . s .) which has individuals who pay dues (referred to as taxes) to help public authorities run faculties, and those faculties get run in accordance to the club handbook (the U. S. structure) Now the structure says our club steers sparkling of religion. If we pay for it with taxes it may't count number on it. That’s interior the pesky by potential of-rules. so see you later as were all paying our taxes, NO faith IN faculties. in uncomplicated words authentic technology might want to be allowed into the lecture room. smart layout isn’t shown by potential of any technology or something, Christians basically made it up. And faith from a technology attitude might want to be - the idea that 2 centuries of consistent clinical information by potential of thousands of logical minds is incorrect and that Earth and existence were no longer created by potential of a causal chain of events yet by potential of an infinitely understanding, loving and effectual--yet possible indecisive and likely bipolar--deity in decrease than a week. Its maximum effectual argument is its compelling fact that in case you do not count number on it, you'll pass to Hell and roast for eternity even as demons gangrape you with white-warm tridents.

2016-10-17 05:30:34 · answer #5 · answered by chicklis 4 · 0 0

Biblical Creationists have no interest in honesty.

As for saying science only, no theories, that eliminates the theory of gravity and the electromagnetic theory. Is teaching geometric theorems in geometry also improper?

2007-02-05 10:04:52 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0 2

I agree, use science class for science, not theories. That includes all theories such as Evolution. Why teach about something that we can't answer.

2007-02-05 09:49:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

No. However evolutionism is not science, it is religion.

2007-02-05 09:46:56 · answer #8 · answered by hasse_john 7 · 2 6

fedest.com, questions and answers