...in order to garner more than just 2 or 3 responses? WHY?
Does one have a need to be offended or angered in order to motivate a response?
Do some responders look for a thrill in the composing of a contencious response & a question may not lend itself to such?
Does the scripture that you already have prepared for a routine instant posting reply not seem suitable to the particular religious question?
Do most realize that the likelyhood of engrained beliefs being changed by others is probably near nil so a question may not be worth the effort of response from you?
Or, as is usually encountered in responses, will some simply say they cannot understand the very complex(?) questions such as I have posted here?
2007-02-05 09:30:43 · 4 answers · asked by dollparty.geo 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You are too funny!Not enough detail can you add some more on please?
2007-02-05 09:36:33 · answer #1 · answered by Sandora 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well it depends on who is asking the questions as there are alot of little children and immature people running artound on this forum asking all types of silly questions and it has to do also with the fact that certain people are more known then others on this board
2007-02-05 17:43:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I;m sorry dude, you cant avoid the conflict, its what this section is primarily used for. Religion is one of the firmest beliiefs a person can hold so of course they will promote and defend it.
2007-02-05 17:36:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Good observation. and really one that does not require an answer, simply an open thought.
2007-02-05 17:39:55 · answer #4 · answered by Conway 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋