Agreed.
2007-02-05 08:16:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by froggypjs 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it would be great if people could participate without attacking others, (and using words like soul is ok if that's what you believe). Using it is not disrespectful, as previous answerers would have you to believe. There is a difference between typing what you believe, (even if someone doesn't like all the "words" you use), and personally attacking someone. It's pretty much impossibel to share beliefs for some people without involving the soul. Don't get offended at words.
2007-02-05 08:25:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by kittymimm 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't lend body parts.
I try... but sometimes, when I see someone acting really stupid, I just let go and let em have it.
It would be awesome if that's what this place was really about. I'm curious about what others think on this subject, but I can't get an honest answer when everyone is arguing and treating each other like ****.
Well, if I can find the best in me, I'll try to get it to do something. =)
2007-02-05 08:24:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kithy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Too many people have too many books or guidelines telling them how to live their lives. I say try a little common decency and tolerance. If we would stop classifying ourselves as atheists, Jews, Christians, Hindu, Muslim, or agnostics we may find a little more in common. The only classification I have is 'person'. Its working for me. Maybe some others out there should try it.
2007-02-05 08:30:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Cornbread 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you consider 'New Agers' as those who reject any type of dogma or and who embody an eclectic attitude to easily precise questions by technological information, faith, philosophy, and direct revelation, then i'd be seen one. notwithstanding, i'd also be seen an Agnostic besides and depending on the actual undeniable actuality that I neither have self belief nor disbelieve in God, that to me God is an 'open question' ought to steer on some to have self belief that i'm a Buddhist. it is the challenge with labels, they have a tendency to be open to question themselves.
2016-11-02 10:04:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Agreed.
2007-02-05 08:25:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by אידיאליסטי™ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's called Universal Unitarianism and it is the greatest most harmonious religion out there.
2007-02-05 08:18:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Joshua L 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
weren't you the dude with the holocaust question and the 'six million more' sung by rapturists?
Anyway, if my soul were to be my guide I'd be nowhere since that doesn't exist.
2007-02-05 20:28:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
oh c'mon, thats fun for about 10 minutes, but the real joy of this place is kicking into human nature and starting unnecessary confrontations for giggles!
2007-02-05 08:26:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by panda_unit_g 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I get along just fine as long as theists don't try to legislate their specific religious doctrine into secular law.
2007-02-05 08:19:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by ZER0 C00L ••AM••VT•• 7
·
3⤊
0⤋