Does your apparent inattention to detail (Gos?) have anything to do with your disbelief in scientific explanations?
It's so much easier to just believe rather than study or do research, isn't it?
2007-02-05 05:31:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by lunatic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Assuming you meant God, I believe an intelligent question like this cannot be answered by a mere mortal. Some things are left secret for a reason, and even tho we don't know the reason, we must trust in God that all He does/did/will do is in our best interest. I believe God created our universe, and the all the contents within, but NOONE can prove or disprove either way.
Part of the faith we are to have.:o]
2007-02-05 13:32:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In my opinion you have some rather drastic misconceptions about the universe. First I think a deep understanding of relativity indicates to us we should look at reality as unchanging space/time rather than space changing with time. Not that space/time is fundamental, I do not believe it is, but that space changing with time is not the correct way to understand reality. Looking at reality in this way the universe does not "start" it is fundamentally timeless and time is derived.
The reason I believe the universe exists is that it is fundamentally mathematics and is necessary. To us it does not look like mathematics because we see so little of it. It looks like a four dimensional space/time manifold because likely only those mathematical systems macroscopically similar to a four dimensional space/time manifold contain self aware subsets such as ourselves.
Your god hypothesis does not answer any questions, It just makes bigger questions. Where do the resources to make your god come from? Saying your God "Just is" a far more difficult problem than saying the universe just is because you claim your god is more complicated than the universe is. The more logical answer is that that which is fundamental is simple mathematical logic rather than your magical super complex murderous monster which "just so happens to exist" .
2007-02-05 13:35:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You are appealing to the need for a first cause. Many cosmological theories to not require one, or provide one.
To say 'God is the first cause' is to beg the question, "where did God come from then?" If you then say, "He was always here," then why can you not conceive that something entirely naturalistic and non-conscious"was always here"?
2007-02-05 13:29:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
we generally accept that the universe has always existed, and that the there are a constant cycle of "big bangs" happening for all of eternities past and future.
2007-02-05 13:28:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bronze_2 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a GOD, GOD said and BANG it happened!
2007-02-05 13:28:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Slider 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The universe was formed from something that always existed. Something unconscious.
2007-02-05 13:29:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Just because you don't know where the universe came from doesn't automatically mean it came from the divine.
2007-02-05 13:28:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Militant Agnostic 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is God in the form of sun, moon, air, water, fire, earth...
2007-02-05 13:29:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by lakshmi d 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's a physics question doing in R&S?
2007-02-05 13:32:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by eldad9 6
·
0⤊
0⤋