Based on his works, Dawkins has alligned his attacks on religion with Christianity and didn't really look into the rational aspects of Islam and its compability to science in history compared to Christianity. If he were to look into Islam and Science, would he opened his mind to accept that Islam per se is rational.
2007-02-05
01:07:41
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
To one of the answerer, to say that Dawkins is superior in his understanding of the world than all of Islamic scholars is a blatant evidence of ignorance and naivitiy. There are a militudes of Islamic scholars who are willing to refute Dawkins' logic but is not highlighted and not as famous as Dawkins. It must be reiterated that being a "famous" scholars in a particular field does not tantamount as being correct and right. I think the sheer embodiment of ignorance and arrogance is what drive this kind of mentality.
2007-02-05
22:26:05 ·
update #1
Richard Dawkins, despite whatever you believe to be the supposed harmony between Islamic precepts and science, could not on principle convert to Islam because he denies one of its fundamental tenets, the most definitive pillar in fact which states “There is no God but Allah and Muhammad is his prophet”.
He believes that - and this is using his own words - God is at best a “superfluous proposition” and is at worst not a “parsimonious one”. The degree to which Dawkins subscribes to evolutionary theory, and the manner in which he explains it, signifies that there is simply no room in his mind for a God to be seminal or even necessary for the creation of the universe, the earth, or life on earth.
The only place were I can see a concurrence between Dawkins worldview and Islam is that both have a degree of determinism inherent in their explanations for why we are here in that evolutionary theory provides a constraint based solely on what is most advantageous to our survival and reproduction, while Islam, in its most traditional sense adheres to a form of predestination, which is ordained by Allah himself. Both evolutionary theory and the theistic explanation of the universe provided by monotheistic faiths like Islam emphasize that our outcome is contingent solely on our origins and on our environment.
Yet that flimsy and superficial similarity between Dawkin’s belief in evolutionary theory and Islam is a far cry from stating that Dawkins can easily be converted to Islam, or that Dawkins outlook would allow him to readily accept Islam. On a very fundamental level Dawkins is absolutely opposed to Islam because he is an atheist, and believes that God, while impossible to disprove for logical reasons, is so improbable and unnecessary that one would be well within reason not to believe in him.
Despite whatever parallels one can draw between Dawkins ideas of life, and Islam, the denial of the axiomatic belief of Islam, that there is a God, makes Dawkins an unlikely candidate for conversion to the Muslim faith. It’s wishful thinking to believe otherwise.
2007-02-05 08:20:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lawrence Louis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The truth is frightening, isn't it, especially when it proves all your sacred beliefs are dust.
Rational Islam? Huh? Rational religion is an oxymoron. Richard IS a very respected scientist who know more about how the real world works than any religious person ever has or ever will. Islam, Christianity, and all religions are not based on rationality, but on mindless superstition and hate. Richard's mind is more open and free and has more power than a million religious believers put together.
More power to the mighty truth of Dawkins!
2007-02-05 11:27:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You haven't read much of Dawkins's work have you? Most of it is not concerned with religion at all. When he does discuss religion, as he does in his latest book, he does not concentrate his arguments against Christianity but against all religions including Islam. You should read his book The God Delusion, it is an excellent and thought provoking work.
2016-05-24 17:52:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who knows - maybe.
Its a shame that if people would learn what the Christian Holy manuscripts say, instead of listening to a bunch of stupid peoples stories that pretend to know Gods Word, then the Christian God would make perfect sense, and it does in fact have no controversy with science whatsoever. The Bible, for example, says that this earth is eons and eons old, not the 6000 years that some say. Its just a matter of stupid people thinking they know Gods Word. But its only peoples words you hear.
2007-02-05 01:15:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, Dawkins is as harsh about Islam as he is about the other religions. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for Dawkins converting to Islam. That religion, like all others are irrational.
2007-02-05 01:13:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by nondescript 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
He would probably throw up a little bit in his mouth at the thought.
After all Islams gave us this gem, "mountains are exist to hold down the earth". and "when the sun sets it goes down into a muddy lake at night".
And let's not forget the decree to drink camel urine as a stomach ache cure.
2007-02-05 01:19:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Probably not. He ridicules various religions in his documentaries such as "The God Delusion"...
Although he is intelligent, his ego surpasses his knowledge.
2007-02-05 01:14:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Very likely.
The real question is, what if pigs fly and go into Muslim countries?
2007-02-05 01:11:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
he will realise that islam is a load of horse muck
lol
2007-02-05 01:11:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Proud Muslimah Beautiful Islam 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
It would be very good...
=P
2007-02-05 01:19:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋