1) The html generated is not the best but it works
2) The generated html is fully functional even if not perfectly coded
How would you say it otherwise?
2007-02-04 23:58:29 · 12 answers · asked by Lorenzo 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Languages
The html, as generated, is completely functional although improvements in the coding are necessary.
2007-02-05 00:05:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
1) The html generated is not the best, but it works.
2) The generated html is fully functional, even if not perfectly coded.
They both sound OK...... I'm not sure how "technical" what you're writing is.
2007-02-05 00:01:04 · answer #2 · answered by mdlbldrmatt135 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
3) The generated html is fully functional although not perfectly coded.
Number 2 is more correct.
2007-02-05 00:01:12 · answer #3 · answered by sacanda_trina 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The generated html works but is not perfectly coded.
####
If you say fully functional it means there is nothing wrong with it.
fully means 100% .
if you want you can say:
The generated html functions well but is not perfectly coded.
2007-02-05 00:00:59 · answer #4 · answered by Foster Clark 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Based on other programming languages HTML is cumbersome, incomplete, and a terrible language to work with.
OR
HTML as a programming language would have been laughed at if it was included with the TI-99/4A, Commodore 64, or IBM PC Jr. One giant leap for mankind… Unfortunately, backwards!
2007-02-05 00:14:47 · answer #5 · answered by Renoirs_Dream 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The html isn't perfect, but it functions.
2007-02-05 00:01:11 · answer #6 · answered by tabulator32 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the second is better
but you could also say:
the html generated works, but can be coded better.
2007-02-05 00:04:19 · answer #7 · answered by praavita 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
#1 is better. It's simpler and uses fewer words to say the same thing as the second one.
2007-02-05 00:03:52 · answer #8 · answered by Babu Chicorico 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the second one
2007-02-05 00:00:55 · answer #9 · answered by Steppenwolfer 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
depends what language it originated the translation from .
i would say nr.2
2007-02-05 00:01:07 · answer #10 · answered by silverearth1 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋