I propose that to completely remove the link between people who accept evolution and Evolutionism (as in the communist/Marxist philosophy), we now use the term "evolutionaries".
I personally think this carries a more positive tone. What's your opinion?
2007-02-04 21:24:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
First answer, yeah that works too :)
2007-02-04 21:35:31 · update #1
Scientist doesn't work, it implies that one holds a scientific education/career of some kind.
2007-02-04 23:33:37 · update #2
In academic circles, the debate is referred to as "evolution vs. creationism", and that is quite accurate. I see no need for any new terminology.
2007-02-04 21:29:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't agree with Scientist, that's a person who practices science professionally. Not exactly familiar with the Marxist theory of Evolutionism but it occurs a lot in philosophy for two views to have the same word: Naturalist (Capital N) Earth loving nudist. naturalist (small n) philisophical belief that there exists only one plane of existence and it is the material world we experience.
I would suggest Darwinian but evolution has expanded since he first proposed the idea. Mendellian? Again not the most contemporary.
Ohh, how about Mutants? Mutation in it's scientific definition is incredibly common as it accounts for any chemical process that corrupts the original strand of DNA. It's proposed that in species mutation occurs naturally throughout a creautre's lifetime as the strain of endlessly copying DNA into new growing cells creates discrepancies. Over millions of generations it is even proposed that mutation is necessary alongside inheritance and natural selection to create a new species, the random variations stopping a gene pool from stagnating whilst abilities are being honed and developed.
2007-02-04 21:58:55 · answer #2 · answered by jleslie4585 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no, the proper word is 'scientist'. All accusations towards evolution (such as 'evolutionists say this or that') are always made by creationists. This makes them easy to spot.
No serious scientist will designate himself 'evolutionist' nor 'evolutionary', although I got a chuckle out of it.
2007-02-04 21:43:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Hello Puppy.. :)
For those that said Scientist..
What about Scientist that are Christians..
In Jesus Most Precious Name..
With Love..In Christ.. :)
2007-02-04 22:08:25 · answer #4 · answered by EyeLovesJesus 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You scared the Kanye outta me, what's a remember, you got Kanye on your ears, hi Kanye for brains, I gotta use the Kanyer. Beats the Kanye outta me, i might desire to flow on yet who somewhat supplies a Kanye.
2016-09-28 10:53:05 · answer #5 · answered by durrell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no evolutionist
no darwinism
so that leaves only one word that cant be replaced
2007-02-04 21:51:53 · answer #6 · answered by noteparece? 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Evolutionist=Delusional
2007-02-04 21:35:48 · answer #7 · answered by RBRN 5 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Scientist will suffice.
2007-02-04 21:37:02 · answer #8 · answered by novangelis 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
"retards" well that is already used.
"nutsist" but that could be use to much.
"liearies" i perfer that one.
"fraudaries" that is more like it.
"athiest" already used
"stupidoes" that the ticked
educated fools= edfools
ape brained scientist ABS or could mean All B** Sh**
How about men with little brains, MLB Men lacking brains.
2007-02-04 21:52:06 · answer #9 · answered by Thomas A 2 · 0⤊ 6⤋
How about "educated"?
2007-02-04 21:28:20 · answer #10 · answered by PartyTime 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋