English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

does that mean the Bible approves of such things as unmarried couples living together, severely disable babies being put to death at birth, which the Church of England approves of?

It took 150 years to get a Bible that wasn't as strict at the Geneva Bible. It immortalized the memory of King James, as he prevented the men working on it from being put to death as was required by the Roman Catholic Church for anyone trying to revise the Bible.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Version_of_the_Bible
http://www.christiantoday.com/article/church.of.england.faces.opposition.after.approving.cohabitation.rights/7979.htm
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=416003&in_page_id=1770

2007-02-04 20:16:32 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

6 answers

The day the Church allows, justifies or excuses ungodly behaviour is the day God will distance himself from it & ultimately it will disappear into oblivion.

2007-02-12 19:46:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lack of information = confusion! back! and that i'm relating the countless responses. The NKJV is the most usually utilized in Pentecostal church homes because it has the least planned blunders i.e. some 30 translation blunders in Genesis on my own. notwithstanding, that suggested, we nevertheless have the Jewish Torah it truly is hand-copied over thousands of years because the middle of our Christian bible so any OT anomalies may be truly spoke of. Secondly, the Greek Orthodox church, nevertheless right this moment, holds its amenities in historic Greek so we've get admission to to the originals in both languages besides because the means to study the NT/OT for gaps and misinterpretations. Even the NIV might want to easily be used with assistance from mature Christians wishing to get admission to at least an extra ordinary to examine version of the Bible - it deliberately misses out on some key themes and mistranslates others. something else of the variations are worse. So, 'certain'!

2016-11-02 09:02:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I prefer the New American Standard

that is the best translation for me - replaced my KJV in 1973

God still does not approve of unmarried couples living together
nor the death of babies nor abortion - they are innocent lives

2007-02-04 20:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 0 1

actual Biblical scholars use a concordance, that refers to the original Aramaic and Greek texts. And don't forget the Apocrypha.

2007-02-04 20:21:08 · answer #4 · answered by David B 6 · 1 1

http://joshuakane.diaryland.com/older.html
http://www.deceptioninthechurch.com/fprophets.html
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/brian_whitaker/2006/06/native_misinformants.html

"When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him"
(Deuteronomy 18:22).

2007-02-12 03:30:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I'm sorry but what is your question?

2007-02-04 20:19:34 · answer #6 · answered by Adia Azrael 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers