English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

No jews, no muslims, no christians

since none behave none should be allowed to saty... Only animals or mixed hippy groups whos only cutlure is no sexsim, homophobia and be nice...



Or start with destroying 10 mosques and synagogs any time there is any hastle

2007-02-04 20:15:57 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

no judy saying wipe out the whole holy land and all the fighters on both sides then only those who promise to be nice are allows in

2007-02-04 20:44:43 · update #1

13 answers

nuke 'em ...nuke 'em all I say.

2007-02-04 20:18:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

Nuking isn't exactly environmentally friendly, now is it?

Nature reserves are great, but human reserves are better (just think of the wide open spaces).

As for forcing an area to be religion free - the old Soviet Union tried that, religion merely went underground.

You need better solutions.

2007-02-05 04:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by Sun is Shining ❂ 7 · 0 0

That's quite funny dude.... ops, cue the people with no humour to do the thumbs down.

But if we nuke every place that started any hassle i think the whole world will be flattened.... but making everyone leave if they cant behave is a good start.

2007-02-05 04:24:14 · answer #3 · answered by 2 good 2 miss 6 · 0 0

If we commit genocide, we're no better than their god and we put more crap into the air. There must be a better way, like just taxing the churches. That would get rid of a lot of evangelists, if there was no money in it!

2007-02-05 04:27:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Nukes aren't that great for nature. Nor do they obliterate history.

In fact, the Romans tried this approach in 70 CE. It doesn't work. It's also not the kind of solution to encourage in the times when many different peoples have nuclear weapons.

If you are considering the use of nukes, please consider Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the moral implications of the bombings of these cities.

Sensible to look for other solutions.

2007-02-05 04:18:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Works for me.

Non-Believers
"Where No Religion is a Good Thing"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Non-Believers/

2007-02-05 04:25:49 · answer #6 · answered by ? 1 · 0 0

How about we nuked you? Can't you see that the majority of the people that live there want peace. As with all things, it's just a few dipsticks that ruin it for everyone else. The soloution is dialogue, not the nucking of innocent people!

2007-02-05 04:20:26 · answer #7 · answered by Sam G 4 · 1 2

Wow, and I thought that I thought outside the box?
But I do agree that most conflicts are due to differences in religious beliefs. In Ireland its the Catholics vs the Protestants, in Africa its Muslims vs Christians, in Bosnia its Muslim vs Orthodox ? and couldn't this list go on and on.

2007-02-05 04:23:12 · answer #8 · answered by hebb 6 · 0 1

Something needs to be done, but nuking is extreme!!!!

2007-02-05 04:44:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

lets start with you you are a waste to society, ignorance is your most profound personality trait i would put some money on that

2007-02-05 04:20:53 · answer #10 · answered by Are we using our brains today 3 · 1 2

Jerusalem is the city of God, Jesus will stop it when he returns.

2007-02-05 04:18:53 · answer #11 · answered by jp 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers