2007-02-04 13:17:25 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yeah, only Moohammad was a difficult birth, and it took a couple of hundred years for him to be born!
2007-02-04 13:20:54 · answer #1 · answered by tattie_herbert 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Jesus was God the Son, come to earth in human form, born as a baby of flesh and blood. While He was born on earth around the year 0 A.D., He has existed as part of the trinity for eternity. The Bible refers to Him as God's ONLY begotten Son - meaning He is the sole "direct offspring" of God, though Jesus did have younger siblings born to His earthly parents historically.
The dates often given for Muhammad's life are 570-632 AD/CE, but no one knows for sure the exact date of his birth. Regardless, he is obviously no twin of anyone born centuries before him. He is also utterly dissimilar to Jesus, as he is emphatically NOT the Son of God, nor was he a servant of the God of the Scriptures, as the religion he created was opposed to and at odds with that of the Bible. Among other things, Muhammed claimed that Jesus, while a prophet of Allah, was merely a man and not God, and that He was even inferior as a prophet to Muhammed himself.
2007-02-04 21:48:37 · answer #2 · answered by Matt c 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is no associaste of Moohammads other than he died on the cross so that he could be forgiven. Jesus is the one and only true living God. Moohammad was only a human just as we are. He never died and rose from any grave or was persecuted for our sins.
2007-02-04 21:23:51 · answer #3 · answered by hadessah48 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Muhammed isn't even mentioned in the bible. I think you have the Koran confused with the bible. Jesus is the ONLY Son of God - Muhammed was a mere sinful man - not another 'son of God'.
2007-02-04 21:21:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
They were born 600 years apart.
2007-02-04 21:19:47 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Marc 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
First, learn how to spell. Then ask an intelligent question. Your ignorance amuses me.
2007-02-04 21:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by Hollynfaith 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No they didn't even live in the same time period.
2007-02-04 21:26:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i was going to answer u, but u know what, its NOT worth it. get a life and read the bible and quran!!! that is if u can read. JESUS IS NOT GOD, HE IS A PROPHET!
2007-02-04 21:26:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No relation either biological or doctrinal!
2007-02-04 21:25:36 · answer #9 · answered by revdauphinee 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Grow up and study a timeline.
2007-02-04 21:20:33 · answer #10 · answered by lizardmama 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋