i dont get it i mean there are now scientists who want evolution out of schools because it gives them a bad name. I mean there is also lots of evidence proving that evolution is not true and Creation is. I just dont understand. How can you study the human body and say it just happened by chance. The human body is too complicated to have just happened. Sorry just curious.
2007-02-04
11:17:27
·
34 answers
·
asked by
horsendurancelvr
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
for those of u who dont believe the scientist wanting it not taught check out this website
www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm#scientists
and check this one out too
www.4hurtingchristians.com/evidence_of_why_charles_darwin_is_wrong_about_evolution.html
or just google proving evolution is wrong
take ur pick.
2007-02-04
11:34:41 ·
update #1
and f.y.i. people God is real and He didnt just happen either and u people are so uneducated there is plenty of evidence to support Creation and plenty to dispute Evolution
do some research before u just assume
2007-02-04
11:36:59 ·
update #2
and for those of u who dont believe in God i feel bad for uu u should try to get used to heat or get saved cuz if u dont get saved u will be in a place u dont wanna go Hell.
2007-02-04
11:39:13 ·
update #3
i will not go to talkorgins.com unless one of u goes to one of my websites. im not gonna learn about something that is not true sorry.
2007-02-04
11:41:53 ·
update #4
those websites are www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm#scientists and www.4hurtingchristians.com/evidence_of_why_charles_darwin_is_wrong_about_evolution.html sorry they got cut off
2007-02-04
11:50:46 ·
update #5
ok if u want the website just email me they wont stay on the thing. my email address is horsendurancelvr@yahoo.com
2007-02-04
11:52:17 ·
update #6
will somebody email me if u want proof do not sit here and say i have no proof when im asking that u email me for proof i promise ill give it to u and fyi evolution has not been proven it cannot be proven as science. here ill give u an example of evidence evolution is incorrect..... there is no fossil evidence of any odf the creatures in between organisms. there is no animal in between 2 species. even darwin himself admitted this and that it is a huge thing to dispute his theory. and people it is caled the evolution theory because it is a theory it has not been proven true and science
2007-02-05
07:53:34 ·
update #7
y do u people ask for evidence but when i ask u to email me for it u dont? will someone plez email me
2007-02-06
11:26:46 ·
update #8
Actually, the unanimous opinion of all credible biologists, everywhere, of every religion and nationality, is that evolution is indisputable fact.
There are literally more historians currently denying the holocaust than biologists denying evolution.
Denial of either, however, is nothing more and nothing less than a profound character flaw.
2007-02-04 11:20:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Contemplative Monkey 3
·
15⤊
3⤋
Evolution is a scientific theory. Unlike what creationists say, a theory is not some wild idea, it is the consensus among experts because it is supported but the evidence and there is simply no better explaination. Natural selection, the main mechanism of evolution is pretty much common sense when you think about it. Any given population has variability. Those best adapted are the fitest and reproduce the most, thus their genes survive better. A change in ecology forces only those best suited and those with beneficial mutations to survive. Dogs are artifically selected, meaning the different breeds are created by man, not god, and not nature. They only way man was able to do this is if natural selection is true. Furthermore, we have mountains of supporting evidence, from the billions of fossils that fit in the puzzle of natural history, to the many experiments done in labs all over the world every day. We have observed selection and evolution, we have billions of fossils that change over time. The more we discover, the more we learn, the more the evidence becomes clear. Evolution is a logical and well supported theory. And thats why I "believe" in evolution, not because of faith but because of evidence and logic. (I could talk about evolution all day, but I have to draw the line somewhere, but i got lots more evidence!)
2016-05-24 07:26:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Creationists and evolutionists are part of the same equation as far as I'm concerned. Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden is a SYMBOLIC recounting of the creation of man, not meant to be taken LITERALLY! God endowed his creations with the power to evolve and develop in response to their environments. I do not see why God could not have intervened during the course of evolution to insert His creation of man and woman when He decided to add mankind to His list of creatures. Who's to say God could not have manipulated the course of creation with His desire to create man? I don't see the exclusion of God from the scientifically proven process of evolution. Science has just explained the logical progression employed by God in scientific terms. But God still remains as the Source for all phenomenon, scientific or otherwise. So, mankind has come to understand very clearly the God-driven engine called evolution. So science and religion should just shake hands and stop fighting one another as without God nothing would be in existence! Where did any organism originate from in the first place? God, the Source, of course! And we can describe God in scientific terms and religious terms. Scientists perhaps cannot decide, as to what came first, the chicken or the egg? It's the egg, people and the egg is from God, the Source, then came the chicken, at some stage in evolution, and here we are!
2007-02-04 13:55:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If your main problem with evolution is that the human body couldn't have "just happened", then why are you so willing to accept creationism? Creationism says that an all-powerful, all-knowing, supreme deity -- which would have to be the most complicated and advanced thing in the entire universe -- just happened. Nothing came before him; he was just already there at the beginning. How does THAT make sense?
And the only scientists who have a problem with evolution are the "creation scientists" (creation science being an oxymoron, in my opinion). Evolution is overwhelmingly accepted. This isn't a controversy in the scientific community -- it's not even a debate.
2007-02-04 11:22:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by . 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
First of all you have no idea what your talking about. There is no such things as evolutionists. The human body didn't just happen, life has been evolving for over 4 billion years! There is no credible evidence against evolution.
Why do people think evolution and god cant coexist? God manipulates nature, he doesn't take full complete control.
2007-02-04 12:03:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
You need to do a lot of reading on both sides of the subject. Stay undecided for the meantime. I have decided to remain agnostic as it seems to be the only sensible approach to the subject. All i would say about evolution is, it happened slowly. The human body did not just appear one morning out of the mist. Slow step by step changes are the way it happened. Intelligent design has possibilities, but what intelligence and what design? Happy reading be well.
2007-02-04 11:26:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eso_ uk 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No scientist is trying to get evolution out of the schools. No real scientist, anyway. There is no evidence for creation, no matter what your pastor told you. Maybe you should check out a few books or websites that WEREN'T written by someone trying to disprove evolution. Did YOU study anatomy? I don't think so.
You don't have to believe in evolution. It works whether or not you believe. That's the great thing about reality.
2007-02-04 11:22:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by eri 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
"...there is lots of evidence proving that evolution is not true..."
Where? Give me some websites.
"...and Creation is."
Again, I'd like to see where you get this information.
"How can you study the human body and say it just happened by chance."
Who says that the human body just happened by chance? Who have you been talking to???
"The human body is too complicated to have just happened."
Finally, some curiosity poking through your question!!
Now, go learn about Evolution and visit the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History, while you're at it. Don't leave any stone unturned!
2007-02-04 11:57:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋
Pretty much every human society has a creation story. The reason that divine origin of life has been rejected by science is because there is an enormous amount of evidence for evolution, and virtually none for Creationism.
2007-02-04 11:23:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Nicole B 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
It didn't happen by chance, that implies that every birth of every organism, ever, was a random chance. Evolution is a probability, which is different from your definition of chance where, given enough time and opportunity, probabilities become certainties. Evolution is a slow, progressive accumulation of traits in ever divergent lineages. Most every scientist supports evolution, while creationism is based on a book of myths written in the Bronze Age.
2007-02-04 11:22:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Psyleet 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Don't be sorry your right. The fact that we are here on this planet where the environment is exactly right for humans and all sorts of life. The fact that though we were not the first life form on this planet and yet we are the highest on the evolutionary scale now.The fact that nothing can come from nothing is overwhelming proof.(How can there be a big bang if there was nothing to create the elements that caused the bang in the first place)
All I'm saying is that we were created and the world and the cosmos was created.Now I wasn't there I'm just saying that if we did evolve then that evolution was brought forth by a higher power with a grand design in mind.
2007-02-04 11:32:51
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ben 2
·
0⤊
3⤋