Weapons of mass destruction, bad intelligence, for Iraqi Democracy, terrorism, fighting those that hate freedom-hmm, what the heck is the reason?
“Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.” — Nazi Reich Marshal Hermann Göring while in his jail cell during the Nuremberg Trials
And if all others accepted the lie which the party imposed-if all records told the same tale-then the lie passed into history and became the truth.” (Page 37, chapt III) 1984
2007-02-04 10:43:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
To further Bush and the Fascist movement toward control of the money involved in the Middle East.
2007-02-04 10:36:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
There are a lot of great things going on in Iraq: schools, hospitals, businesses, and employment!
The News Media & the Democrats do not want us to know anything good going on.
But, if you want to do a little work, you can find out.
2007-02-04 10:26:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
To make the oil industry and the military weapons manufacturers and military war profiteers more money. Remember, they got huge tax breaks from the bush administration twice since 2001. And, now they are making billions from our taxes we pay in. Welcome to the United States of War profiteers Welfare state.
2007-02-04 10:56:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Once again, here is what the Democrats said about Iraq:
Read it and weep, liberals:
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998
"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998
"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998
"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002
2007-02-04 11:22:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by SnowWebster2 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
Weapons of Mass Destruction. Hard to find, ya know!
2007-02-04 10:23:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Runa 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Looking 4 ET, I think
2007-02-04 10:31:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by DukeofDixie 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
Oil, Oil, Oil....oh ya, and getting back at Sadam for trying to kill Bush's daddy....and Oil!
2007-02-04 11:15:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by tarita 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Why are we asking questions to which our minds are not open to hear answers?
2007-02-04 10:46:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by rumezzo 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
No one really knows.Once the order was given ,it was to late.
2007-02-04 10:46:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by (A) 7
·
2⤊
1⤋