EVERY FIGHT WAS PREDICTABLE. I dont see how we can compare this to Crocop Fedor two years ago.
2007-02-04 06:34:51 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Martial Arts
How was it predictable?... If you watch it for one or 2 fights only then why pay the money?... Sure Rampage was supposed to win and Cro Cop too. But they weren't majorly impressive like everyone predicted. And Silva almost got his *** kicked by Luter so... Predictable not really. And comon look at that fight between Frankie Edgar and Tyson Griffin. That was an awesome fight and a deffinate upset.
BTW. All UFC PPV events are $49.95 so this isn't anything new. And compared to WWE as someone else mentioned. Who charge $40 for a RAW only PPV $50 for an event like the Royal Rumble and $60 for Wrestlemania. Mean while the fights are the same ones you saw on RAW or Smackdown the week before.
And who compared it to Fedor Cro-Cop's fight from before.
Buddy save your money and pick another sport to watch. Cause if you think calling this event predictable and then saying it was nothing like the other fight. Didn't you just prove to yourself it isn't predictable by saying it was nothing like the other fight...
Maybe you should stick to WWE or TNA they seem like more of what you want in a fight...
2007-02-04 09:50:02 · answer #1 · answered by Judoka 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I've never thought that Pay-per-view prices were reasonable. Remember the days of Iron Mike Tyson? You pay $50 for just the one fight and you get an hour of previews and interviews followed by about 10 seconds of Tyson pounding some schmo into the ground and then another hour of replaying the fight.
I've never paid for a PPV sporting event. I always go to some other suckers house to watch.
2007-02-04 14:57:13 · answer #2 · answered by kungfufighter20002001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. I doesn't matter what PPV event (or tickets for in house action) you purchase, it's going to be around $50. The UFC could not predict that Serra would hurt his knee and that Lutter would inexcusably not make weight.
2007-02-04 20:19:47 · answer #3 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was very expensive, and the best fight was an under card that came on after the final fight. it was in HD though, and that is huge. i've been waiting for that forever. it's sooo much better. if you're huge fan like me and my buddies you'll grin and bear the cost. we usually rotate who's house hosts. it's always a good time and not so bad paying every two or three months.
2007-02-04 17:41:15 · answer #4 · answered by Ken M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think so because when ever you watch any of the UFC events you get what you paid for and it's not like you are seeing Fake crap like the wrestling bull crap.The UFC shows you the real stuff.
2007-02-04 15:36:34 · answer #5 · answered by jw2002a 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it wasnt. It felt like a glorified hybrid of reality tv, mtv, and professional wrestling. This organization will dig its grave when REAL mma becomes popular.
2007-02-04 21:59:45 · answer #6 · answered by qwerty 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can come to my dance class for way less than that. Hip hop is way more fun than watching TV.
2007-02-04 17:11:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋